From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6DB537755A; Tue, 17 Feb 2026 20:13:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771359220; cv=none; b=K1DeUeAeIxZQSgJLYpCitPiSwmUobWNHRtCCWbAnLwSXAbnqJCiHZV9J+Mc9VTCJG4KvyLbPRVvbn2nLtSN6bOY2A0LrnyB/ncw00V534iBOZSpWb09dvKHqUMo82yRIE9wZKQWg02B0/UgY/108Z5yTMzRXsKtsfuW4C7AhcQI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771359220; c=relaxed/simple; bh=O3KNzwdv/fZolh9vEe47GHGiaeS4Hpe5Gsp1brWunUU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pFmZTxLBBnCN7tpymKAiSEMH+vs2KdBatmu05L9po0HgO5QXCruCYuTpKJ48IwUMeoWp6wVXwMVkonpqIDwp3ouEfjOQMksygHRcGGIWBOxOeNJR9phd2+BvKo8a1dIw1ZGxJ2AE4WcOqYQ1sqH72WENLsrGjKwcVK51eZgQjq4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=go5nyuTk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="go5nyuTk" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D5CAC4CEF7; Tue, 17 Feb 2026 20:13:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1771359220; bh=O3KNzwdv/fZolh9vEe47GHGiaeS4Hpe5Gsp1brWunUU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=go5nyuTkw3Ac1hUXhYVUndWAXOiKYJtszHh1P9R2ACAHgkhM7pToXmL8alG0lOSsv O5V/rrSjAZQkpT2diAPlhAmNGX3Trl7M9m1wajgozmuuRyLDqvbkdhjp7YCRFHs+4t fLnQNrSexcp8U0sX1jVYnSE5x+xE9IeQuGPXZPO2JnhU07Y17XemWPGux8F+mDr4Gd sYOSmkz/i24+izPybQRX23xyP8w9WMzPSKHaHKB7EoRD1Vh0lARB9Nkv9SOyfK00t8 wR6EElkoxYpbv95s91Ww73C7quHjPvuE4wWDOMTyNE4dc+Xart6U/p6qBcuf5QZ5e0 h8S6TM2IEpQ2Q== Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 13:13:38 -0700 From: Keith Busch To: Bart Van Assche Cc: John Garry , lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Native SCSI multipath support Message-ID: References: <69349b51-72c2-47f9-948f-f89843af62e4@oracle.com> <049a177d-85d6-4c9d-9a9a-f07391046101@acm.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <049a177d-85d6-4c9d-9a9a-f07391046101@acm.org> On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 11:33:12AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote: > More important: what will the performance impact be on SCSI devices that > do not need multipath support? UFS devices don't need multipath support > and soon (later this year) will support more than one million IOPS per > device. Further performance improvements are on the roadmap. For nvme, we can detect if a device is multipath capable. If not, we skip the multipath layer altogether so it has no performance impact. I'd imagine the generic library version would similarly require an opt-in approach that UFS simply wouldn't subscribe to.