From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
Cc: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] User space RAID5 with ublk and io_uring BPF
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 18:32:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaOlPXCM/ecbrTj5@pop-os.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALTww28QMg=YXqKWpWLZrLO+xiqOe3LGyput8dx68-dnQsxg=g@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 01:38:46PM +0800, Xiao Ni wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm doing some work on user-space RAID recently. I'd like to propose a
> topic for LSF/MM 2026 regarding the implementation of RAID5 in user
> space using ublk and io_uring bpf[1], particularly focusing on the
> challenges encountered and potential kernel improvements needed.
>
> Ublk raid5 uses the ublk framework (tools/testing/selftests/ublk/),
> with the goal of leveraging io_uring's zero-copy capabilities and
> BPF[1] for performance optimization. The implementation includes:
> * RAID5 stripe handling with configurable chunk sizes
> * Multi-queue support via io_uring
> * Degraded mode for single disk failure tolerance
> * Integration with io_uring BPF struct_ops framework
This is very interesting.
Although technically different with RAID, how about user-space LVM?
I need it for the multikernel use case:
https://lpc.events/event/19/contributions/2074/attachments/1776/3957/Multikernel-LPC2025.pdf
(slide #19)
Relying on the in-kernel LVM is not ideal for provisioning since ublk is
already there.
Also, it does not need to be a complete replacement of existing LVM,
a simple ublk-defined storage isolation is sufficient.
Regards,
Cong Wang
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-01 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-19 5:38 [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] User space RAID5 with ublk and io_uring BPF Xiao Ni
2026-02-20 14:13 ` Ming Lei
2026-02-21 9:11 ` Xiao Ni
2026-02-23 15:54 ` Pavel Begunkov
2026-02-23 16:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-02-24 16:24 ` Keith Busch
2026-03-01 2:32 ` Cong Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aaOlPXCM/ecbrTj5@pop-os.localdomain \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=xni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox