public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
To: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests 0/3] fix module unload failures
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 00:30:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaTaDa3m7dAIE2ix@shinmob> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad4c1108-8604-4a09-b3fb-e8f77a4abbcf@flourine.local>

On Feb 24, 2026 / 17:40, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 12:50:20PM +0900, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
[...]
> > From these observations, I identified two problems below.
> > 
> > 1) The requirement check for the loop transport left the nvmet and nvme-
> >    loop modules loaded and it affected the following test. In the
> >    current implementation, the helper function _unload_modules() is
> >    called once, only after nvme/060 has been executed for all specified
> >    transport types. Instead, _unload_modules() should be called after
> >    each run of test test case for every transport. This ensures that the
> >    modules loaded for the requirement check are unloaded.
> > 
> > 2) When _setup_nvmet() does not load the nvmet module, there is no need
> >    for _cleanup_nvmet() to attempts to unload it. _cleanup_nvmet()
> >    should unload a module only if it was loaded by _setup_nvmet().
> > 
> > This series addresses these two problems. The first patch fixes the
> > first problem. The other two patches fix the second problem.
> 
> Looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>

Thanks for the review. FYI, I applied the patches.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-03-02  0:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-23  3:50 [PATCH blktests 0/3] fix module unload failures Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2026-02-23  3:50 ` [PATCH blktests 1/3] check: call _unload_modules for each test run Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2026-02-23  3:50 ` [PATCH blktests 2/3] common/rc: introduce _load_module() Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2026-02-23  3:50 ` [PATCH blktests 3/3] common/nvme: unload nvme modules only when loaded Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2026-02-24 16:40 ` [PATCH blktests 0/3] fix module unload failures Daniel Wagner
2026-03-02  0:30   ` Shinichiro Kawasaki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aaTaDa3m7dAIE2ix@shinmob \
    --to=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    --cc=dwagner@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox