From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: Gulam Mohamed <gulam.mohamed@oracle.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
philipp.reisner@linbit.com, lars.ellenberg@linbit.com,
christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com, minchan@kernel.org,
ngupta@vflare.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org, colyli@suse.de,
kent.overstreet@gmail.com, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org,
dm-devel@redhat.com, song@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
vishal.l.verma@intel.com, dave.jiang@intel.com,
ira.weiny@intel.com, junxiao.bi@oracle.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, kch@nvidia.com,
drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] block: Change the granularity of io ticks from ms to ns
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 21:09:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aadfc6d2-ad04-279c-a1d6-7f634d0b2c99@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y5AFX4sxLRLV4uSt@T590>
Hi,
在 2022/12/07 11:15, Ming Lei 写道:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 10:19:08AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 在 2022/12/07 2:15, Gulam Mohamed 写道:
>>> Use ktime to change the granularity of IO accounting in block layer from
>>> milli-seconds to nano-seconds to get the proper latency values for the
>>> devices whose latency is in micro-seconds. After changing the granularity
>>> to nano-seconds the iostat command, which was showing incorrect values for
>>> %util, is now showing correct values.
>>
>> This patch didn't correct the counting of io_ticks, just make the
>> error accounting from jiffies(ms) to ns. The problem that util can be
>> smaller or larger still exist.
>
> Agree.
>
>>
>> However, I think this change make sense consider that error margin is
>> much smaller, and performance overhead should be minimum.
>>
>> Hi, Ming, how do you think?
>
> I remembered that ktime_get() has non-negligible overhead, is there any
> test data(iops/cpu utilization) when running fio or t/io_uring on
> null_blk with this patch?
Yes, testing with null_blk is necessary, we don't want any performance
regression.
BTW, I thought it's fine because it's already used for tracking io
latency.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ming
>
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-07 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-06 18:15 [RFC] block: Change the granularity of io ticks from ms to ns Gulam Mohamed
2022-12-06 19:31 ` Paul Menzel
2022-12-07 2:19 ` Yu Kuai
2022-12-07 3:15 ` Ming Lei
2022-12-07 13:09 ` Yu Kuai [this message]
2022-12-07 17:22 ` Jens Axboe
2022-12-07 17:08 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aadfc6d2-ad04-279c-a1d6-7f634d0b2c99@huaweicloud.com \
--to=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com \
--cc=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=gulam.mohamed@oracle.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=junxiao.bi@oracle.com \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).