linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: Gulam Mohamed <gulam.mohamed@oracle.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
	philipp.reisner@linbit.com, lars.ellenberg@linbit.com,
	christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com, minchan@kernel.org,
	ngupta@vflare.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org, colyli@suse.de,
	kent.overstreet@gmail.com, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, song@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	vishal.l.verma@intel.com, dave.jiang@intel.com,
	ira.weiny@intel.com, junxiao.bi@oracle.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, kch@nvidia.com,
	drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
	"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] block: Change the granularity of io ticks from ms to ns
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 21:09:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aadfc6d2-ad04-279c-a1d6-7f634d0b2c99@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y5AFX4sxLRLV4uSt@T590>

Hi,

在 2022/12/07 11:15, Ming Lei 写道:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 10:19:08AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 在 2022/12/07 2:15, Gulam Mohamed 写道:
>>> Use ktime to change the granularity of IO accounting in block layer from
>>> milli-seconds to nano-seconds to get the proper latency values for the
>>> devices whose latency is in micro-seconds. After changing the granularity
>>> to nano-seconds the iostat command, which was showing incorrect values for
>>> %util, is now showing correct values.
>>
>> This patch didn't correct the counting of io_ticks, just make the
>> error accounting from jiffies(ms) to ns. The problem that util can be
>> smaller or larger still exist.
> 
> Agree.
> 
>>
>> However, I think this change make sense consider that error margin is
>> much smaller, and performance overhead should be minimum.
>>
>> Hi, Ming, how do you think?
> 
> I remembered that ktime_get() has non-negligible overhead, is there any
> test data(iops/cpu utilization) when running fio or t/io_uring on
> null_blk with this patch?

Yes, testing with null_blk is necessary, we don't want any performance
regression.

BTW, I thought it's fine because it's already used for tracking io
latency.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Ming
> 
> 
> .
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-07 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-06 18:15 [RFC] block: Change the granularity of io ticks from ms to ns Gulam Mohamed
2022-12-06 19:31 ` Paul Menzel
2022-12-07  2:19 ` Yu Kuai
2022-12-07  3:15   ` Ming Lei
2022-12-07 13:09     ` Yu Kuai [this message]
2022-12-07 17:22       ` Jens Axboe
2022-12-07 17:08 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aadfc6d2-ad04-279c-a1d6-7f634d0b2c99@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com \
    --cc=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
    --cc=gulam.mohamed@oracle.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=junxiao.bi@oracle.com \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).