From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7] dm: allow devices to revalidate existing zones
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 08:19:29 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab56c408-c98d-4333-b4f1-c3f380008e12@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z88k2RD6s5KpuxOD@redhat.com>
On 3/11/25 02:43, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 08:59:26AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 3/10/25 07:29, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
>>> dm_revalidate_zones() only allowed devices that had no zone resources
>>> set up to call blk_revalidate_disk_zones(). If the device already had
>>> zone resources, disk->nr_zones would always equal md->nr_zones so
>>> dm_revalidate_zones() returned without doing any work. Instead, always
>>> call blk_revalidate_disk_zones() if you are loading a new zoned table.
>>>
>>> However, if the device emulates zone append operations and already has
>>> zone append emulation resources, the table size cannot change when
>>> loading a new table. Otherwise, all those resources will be garbage.
>>>
>>> If emulated zone append operations are needed and the zone write pointer
>>> offsets of the new table do not match those of the old table, writes to
>>> the device will still fail. This patch allows users to safely grow and
>>> shrink zone devices. But swapping arbitrary zoned tables will still not
>>> work.
>>
>> I do not think that this patch correctly address the shrinking of dm zoned
>> device: blk_revalidate_disk_zones() will look at a smaller set of zones, which
>> will leave already hashed zone write plugs outside of that new zone range in the
>> disk zwplug hash table. disk_revalidate_zone_resources() does not cleanup and
>> reallocate the hash table if the number of zones shrinks.
>
> This is necessary for DM. There could be plugged bios that are on on
> these no longer in-range zones. They will obviously fail when they get
> reissued, but we need to keep the plugs around so that they *do* get
> reissued. A cleaner alternative would be to add code to immediately
> error out all the plugged bios on shrinks, but I was trying to avoid
> adding a bunch of code to deal with these cases (of course simply
> disallowing them adds even less code).
I am confused now :)
Under the assumption that we do not allow switching to a new table that changes
the zone configuration (in particualr, there is no grow/shrink of the device),
then I do not think we have to do anything special for DM.
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-10 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-09 22:28 [RFC PATCH 0/7] dm: fix issues with swapping dm tables Benjamin Marzinski
2025-03-09 22:28 ` [PATCH 1/7] dm: don't change md if dm_table_set_restrictions() fails Benjamin Marzinski
2025-03-09 23:18 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-03-10 16:39 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2025-03-09 22:28 ` [PATCH 2/7] dm: free table mempools if not used in __bind Benjamin Marzinski
2025-03-09 23:19 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-03-09 22:28 ` [PATCH 3/7] dm: handle failures in dm_table_set_restrictions Benjamin Marzinski
2025-03-09 23:25 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-03-10 17:37 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2025-03-10 18:15 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2025-03-10 23:27 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-03-14 13:38 ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-03-14 13:46 ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-03-10 23:16 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-03-09 22:29 ` [PATCH 4/7] dm: fix dm_blk_report_zones Benjamin Marzinski
2025-03-09 23:27 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-03-09 22:29 ` [PATCH 5/7] blk-zoned: clean up zone settings for devices without zwplugs Benjamin Marzinski
2025-03-09 23:31 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-03-09 22:29 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] blk-zoned: modify blk_revalidate_disk_zones for bio-based drivers Benjamin Marzinski
2025-03-09 22:29 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] dm: allow devices to revalidate existing zones Benjamin Marzinski
2025-03-09 23:59 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-03-10 17:43 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2025-03-10 23:19 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2025-03-10 23:42 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2025-03-11 0:00 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-03-09 23:16 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] dm: fix issues with swapping dm tables Damien Le Moal
2025-03-10 16:38 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2025-03-10 23:13 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ab56c408-c98d-4333-b4f1-c3f380008e12@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox