From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] block: use integrity interval instead of sector as seed
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2026 23:34:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adNUE67FpIGF_x7Q@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260403194109.2255933-3-csander@purestorage.com>
On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 01:41:05PM -0600, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> void bio_integrity_setup_default(struct bio *bio)
> {
> struct blk_integrity *bi = blk_get_integrity(bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk);
> struct bio_integrity_payload *bip = bio_integrity(bio);
>
> - bip_set_seed(bip, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
> + bip_set_seed(bip, bio_integrity_intervals(bi, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector));
Should we simply switch bip_set_seed to take a bio bvec_iter argument and
lift all this logic into it? That feels a lot less fragile.
Bonus points for writing useful documentation for the new bip_set_seed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-06 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-03 19:41 [PATCH 0/6] block: fix integrity offset/length conversions Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-04-03 19:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] blk-integrity: take sector_t in bio_integrity_intervals() Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-04-05 11:27 ` Anuj gupta
2026-04-06 6:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-03 19:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] block: use integrity interval instead of sector as seed Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-04-05 11:27 ` Anuj gupta
2026-04-06 6:34 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-04-07 16:48 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-04-03 19:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] bio-integrity-fs: pass data iter to bio_integrity_verify() Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-04-05 11:28 ` Anuj gupta
2026-04-06 6:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-03 19:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] bio-integrity-fs: use integrity interval instead of sector as seed Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-04-05 11:29 ` Anuj gupta
2026-04-06 6:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-03 19:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] t10-pi: use bio_integrity_intervals() helper Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-04-05 23:43 ` Anuj gupta
2026-04-06 6:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-03 19:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] target: " Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-04-05 11:29 ` Anuj gupta
2026-04-05 11:26 ` [PATCH 0/6] block: fix integrity offset/length conversions Anuj gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adNUE67FpIGF_x7Q@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox