From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
Huijun Tang <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/13] bcache: quit dc->writeback_thread when BCACHE_DEV_DETACHING is set
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 10:11:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae18a4d7-b275-0290-73ee-ce8a3e5f8b6d@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180114144236.28213-6-colyli@suse.de>
On 01/14/2018 03:42 PM, Coly Li wrote:
> In patch "bcache: fix cached_dev->count usage for bch_cache_set_error()",
> cached_dev_get() is called when creating dc->writeback_thread, and
> cached_dev_put() is called when exiting dc->writeback_thread. This
> modification works well unless people detach the bcache device manually by
> 'echo 1 > /sys/block/bcache<N>/bcache/detach'
> Because this sysfs interface only calls bch_cached_dev_detach() which wakes
> up dc->writeback_thread but does not stop it. The reason is, before patch
> "bcache: fix cached_dev->count usage for bch_cache_set_error()", inside
> bch_writeback_thread(), if cache is not dirty after writeback,
> cached_dev_put() will be called here. And in cached_dev_make_request() when
> a new write request makes cache from clean to dirty, cached_dev_get() will
> be called there. Since we don't operate dc->count in these locations,
> refcount d->count cannot be dropped after cache becomes clean, and
> cached_dev_detach_finish() won't be called to detach bcache device.
>
> This patch fixes the issue by checking whether BCACHE_DEV_DETACHING is
> set inside bch_writeback_thread(). If this bit is set and cache is clean
> (no existing writeback_keys), break the while-loop, call cached_dev_put()
> and quit the writeback thread.
>
> Please note if cache is still dirty, even BCACHE_DEV_DETACHING is set the
> writeback thread should continue to perform writeback, this is the original
> design of manually detach.
>
> I compose a separte patch because that patch "bcache: fix cached_dev->count
> usage for bch_cache_set_error()" already gets a "Reviewed-by:" from Hannes
> Reinecke. Also this fix is not trivial and good for a separate patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
> Cc: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> Cc: Huijun Tang <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
> index b280c134dd4d..4dbeaaa575bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
> @@ -565,9 +565,15 @@ static int bch_writeback_thread(void *arg)
> while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> down_write(&dc->writeback_lock);
> set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> - if (!atomic_read(&dc->has_dirty) ||
> - (!test_bit(BCACHE_DEV_DETACHING, &dc->disk.flags) &&
> - !dc->writeback_running)) {
> + /*
> + * If the bache device is detaching, skip here and continue
> + * to perform writeback. Otherwise, if no dirty data on cache,
> + * or there is dirty data on cache but writeback is disabled,
> + * the writeback thread should sleep here and wait for others
> + * to wake up it.
> + */
> + if (!test_bit(BCACHE_DEV_DETACHING, &dc->disk.flags) &&
> + (!atomic_read(&dc->has_dirty) || !dc->writeback_running)) {
> up_write(&dc->writeback_lock);
>
> if (kthread_should_stop()) {
> @@ -587,6 +593,14 @@ static int bch_writeback_thread(void *arg)
> atomic_set(&dc->has_dirty, 0);
> SET_BDEV_STATE(&dc->sb, BDEV_STATE_CLEAN);
> bch_write_bdev_super(dc, NULL);
> + /*
> + * If bcache device is detaching via sysfs interface,
> + * writeback thread should stop after there is no dirty
> + * data on cache. BCACHE_DEV_DETACHING flag is set in
> + * bch_cached_dev_detach().
> + */
> + if (test_bit(BCACHE_DEV_DETACHING, &dc->disk.flags))
> + break;
> }
>
> up_write(&dc->writeback_lock);
>
Checking several atomic flags in one statement renders the atomic pretty
much pointless; you need to protect the 'if' clause with some lock or
just check _one_ atomic statement.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-16 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-14 14:42 [PATCH v3 00/13] bcache: device failure handling improvement Coly Li
2018-01-14 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] bcache: set writeback_rate_update_seconds in range [1, 60] seconds Coly Li
2018-01-16 9:03 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-14 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] bcache: properly set task state in bch_writeback_thread() Coly Li
2018-01-16 9:02 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-14 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] bcache: set task properly in allocator_wait() Coly Li
2018-01-16 9:05 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-16 9:29 ` Coly Li
2018-01-14 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] bcache: fix cached_dev->count usage for bch_cache_set_error() Coly Li
2018-01-14 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] bcache: quit dc->writeback_thread when BCACHE_DEV_DETACHING is set Coly Li
2018-01-16 9:11 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2018-01-26 6:21 ` Coly Li
2018-01-14 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] bcache: stop dc->writeback_rate_update properly Coly Li
2018-01-14 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] bcache: set error_limit correctly Coly Li
2018-01-14 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] bcache: add CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE to struct cache_set flags Coly Li
2018-01-14 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] bcache: stop all attached bcache devices for a retired cache set Coly Li
2018-01-14 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] bcache: fix inaccurate io state for detached bcache devices Coly Li
2018-01-16 9:27 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-14 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] bcache: add backing_request_endio() for bi_end_io of attached backing device I/O Coly Li
2018-01-16 9:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-14 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] bcache: add io_disable to struct cached_dev Coly Li
2018-01-16 9:32 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-14 14:42 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] bcache: stop bcache device when backing device is offline Coly Li
2018-01-16 9:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-24 22:23 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] bcache: device failure handling improvement Nix
2018-01-25 3:35 ` Re[2]: " Pavel Goran
2018-01-25 18:57 ` Nix
2018-01-26 4:15 ` Re[2]: " Pavel Goran
2018-01-26 4:56 ` Coly Li
2018-01-26 5:51 ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-26 6:23 ` Coly Li
2018-02-16 12:11 ` Nix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae18a4d7-b275-0290-73ee-ce8a3e5f8b6d@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlyle@lyle.org \
--cc=tang.junhui@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox