public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linlin Zhang <linlin.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, ebiggers@kernel.org,
	mpatocka@redhat.com, gmazyland@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, adrianvovk@gmail.com,
	dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, quic_mdalam@quicinc.com,
	israelr@nvidia.com, hch@infradead.org, axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dm-inlinecrypt: add target for inline block device encryption
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 20:20:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <af84cfb7-b673-404a-a7f9-6efd9d23a08f@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ae65vfakVKg2aGcp@redhat.com>



On 4/27/2026 9:19 AM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 06:40:30AM -0700, Linlin Zhang wrote:
>> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
>>
>> Add a new device-mapper target "dm-inlinecrypt" that is similar to
>> dm-crypt but uses the blk-crypto API instead of the regular crypto API.
>> This allows it to take advantage of inline encryption hardware such as
>> that commonly built into UFS host controllers.
>>
>> The table syntax matches dm-crypt's, but for now only a stripped-down
>> set of parameters is supported.  For example, for now AES-256-XTS is the
>> only supported cipher.
>>
>> dm-inlinecrypt is based on Android's dm-default-key with the
>> controversial passthrough support removed.  Note that due to the removal
>> of passthrough support, use of dm-inlinecrypt in combination with
>> fscrypt causes double encryption of file contents (similar to dm-crypt +
>> fscrypt), with the fscrypt layer not being able to use the inline
>> encryption hardware.  This makes dm-inlinecrypt unusable on systems such
>> as Android that use fscrypt and where a more optimized approach is
>> needed.  It is however suitable as a replacement for dm-crypt.
>>
>> dm-inlinecrypt supports both keyring key and hex key, the former avoids
>> the key to be exposed in dm-table message. Similar to dm-default-key in
>> Android, it will fallabck to the software block crypto once the inline
>> crypto hardware cannot support the expected cipher.
>>
>> Test:
>> dmsetup create inlinecrypt_logon --table "0 `blockdev --getsz $1` \
>> inlinecrypt aes-xts-plain64 :64:logon:fde:dminlinecrypt_test_key 0 $1 0"
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Linlin Zhang <linlin.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/md/Kconfig          |  10 +
>>  drivers/md/Makefile         |   1 +
>>  drivers/md/dm-inlinecrypt.c | 559 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 570 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/md/dm-inlinecrypt.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/Kconfig b/drivers/md/Kconfig
>> index c58a9a8ea54e..aa541cc22ecc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/md/Kconfig
>> @@ -313,6 +313,16 @@ config DM_CRYPT
>>  
>>  	  If unsure, say N.
>>  
>> +config DM_INLINECRYPT
>> +	tristate "Inline encryption target support"
>> +	depends on BLK_DEV_DM
>> +	depends on BLK_INLINE_ENCRYPTION
>> +	help
>> +	  This device-mapper target is similar to dm-crypt, but it uses the
>> +	  blk-crypto API instead of the regular crypto API. This allows it to
>> +	  take advantage of inline encryption hardware such as that commonly
>> +	  built into UFS host controllers.
>> +
>>  config DM_SNAPSHOT
>>         tristate "Snapshot target"
>>         depends on BLK_DEV_DM
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/Makefile b/drivers/md/Makefile
>> index c338cc6fbe2e..517d1f7d8288 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/md/Makefile
>> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DM_UNSTRIPED)	+= dm-unstripe.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_DM_BUFIO)		+= dm-bufio.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_DM_BIO_PRISON)	+= dm-bio-prison.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_DM_CRYPT)		+= dm-crypt.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_DM_INLINECRYPT)	+= dm-inlinecrypt.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_DM_DELAY)		+= dm-delay.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_DM_DUST)		+= dm-dust.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_DM_FLAKEY)		+= dm-flakey.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-inlinecrypt.c b/drivers/md/dm-inlinecrypt.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..b6e98fdf8af1
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-inlinecrypt.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,559 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright 2024 Google LLC
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/blk-crypto.h>
>> +#include <linux/ctype.h>
>> +#include <linux/device-mapper.h>
>> +#include <linux/hex.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <keys/user-type.h>
>> +
>> +#define DM_MSG_PREFIX	"inlinecrypt"
>> +
>> +static const struct dm_inlinecrypt_cipher {
>> +	const char *name;
>> +	enum blk_crypto_mode_num mode_num;
>> +} dm_inlinecrypt_ciphers[] = {
>> +	{
>> +		.name = "aes-xts-plain64",
>> +		.mode_num = BLK_ENCRYPTION_MODE_AES_256_XTS,
>> +	},
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct inlinecrypt_ctx - private data of an inlinecrypt target
>> + * @dev: the underlying device
>> + * @start: starting sector of the range of @dev which this target actually maps.
>> + *	   For this purpose a "sector" is 512 bytes.
>> + * @cipher_string: the name of the encryption algorithm being used
>> + * @iv_offset: starting offset for IVs.  IVs are generated as if the target were
>> + *	       preceded by @iv_offset 512-byte sectors.
>> + * @sector_size: crypto sector size in bytes (usually 4096)
>> + * @sector_bits: log2(sector_size)
>> + * @key: the encryption key to use
>> + * @max_dun: the maximum DUN that may be used (computed from other params)
>> + */
>> +struct inlinecrypt_ctx {
>> +	struct dm_dev *dev;
>> +	sector_t start;
>> +	const char *cipher_string;
>> +	unsigned int key_size;
>> +	u64 iv_offset;
>> +	unsigned int sector_size;
>> +	unsigned int sector_bits;
>> +	struct blk_crypto_key key;
>> +	u64 max_dun;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct dm_inlinecrypt_cipher *
>> +lookup_cipher(const char *cipher_string)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dm_inlinecrypt_ciphers); i++) {
>> +		if (strcmp(cipher_string, dm_inlinecrypt_ciphers[i].name) == 0)
>> +			return &dm_inlinecrypt_ciphers[i];
>> +	}
>> +	return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void inlinecrypt_dtr(struct dm_target *ti)
>> +{
>> +	struct inlinecrypt_ctx *ctx = ti->private;
>> +
>> +	if (ctx->dev) {
>> +		if (ctx->key.size)
>> +			blk_crypto_evict_key(ctx->dev->bdev, &ctx->key);
>> +		dm_put_device(ti, ctx->dev);
>> +	}
>> +	kfree_sensitive(ctx->cipher_string);
>> +	kfree_sensitive(ctx);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool contains_whitespace(const char *str)
>> +{
>> +	while (*str)
>> +		if (isspace(*str++))
>> +			return true;
>> +	return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int set_key_user(struct key *key, char *bin_key,
>> +			const unsigned int bin_key_size)
>> +{
>> +	const struct user_key_payload *ukp;
>> +
>> +	ukp = user_key_payload_locked(key);
>> +	if (!ukp)
>> +		return -EKEYREVOKED;
>> +
>> +	if (bin_key_size != ukp->datalen)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	memcpy(bin_key, ukp->data, bin_key_size);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int inlinecrypt_get_keyring_key(const char *key_string, u8 *bin_key,
>> +					const unsigned int bin_key_size)
>> +{
>> +	char *key_desc;
>> +	int ret;
>> +	struct key_type *type;
>> +	struct key *key;
> 
> There's nothing forcing CONFIG_KEYS to be set when CONFIG_DM_INLINECRYPT
> is, and without it, struct key won't be defined and this won't compile.

Thanks for your review!

ACK. I'll add 'depends on' in kconfig file for CONFIG_DM_INLINECRYPT and
corresponding '#ifdef CONFIG_KEYS' in this code.

> 
>> +	int (*set_key)(struct key *key, char *bin_key,
>> +				   const unsigned int bin_key_size);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Reject key_string with whitespace. dm core currently lacks code for
>> +	 * proper whitespace escaping in arguments on DM_TABLE_STATUS path.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (contains_whitespace(key_string)) {
>> +		DMERR("whitespace chars not allowed in key string");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* look for next ':' separating key_type from key_description */
>> +	key_desc = strchr(key_string, ':');
>> +	if (!key_desc || key_desc == key_string || !strlen(key_desc + 1))
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	if (!strncmp(key_string, "logon:", key_desc - key_string + 1)) {
>> +		type = &key_type_logon;
>> +		set_key = set_key_user;
>> +	} else {
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	key = request_key(type, key_desc + 1, NULL);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(key))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(key);
>> +
>> +	down_read(&key->sem);
>> +
>> +	ret = set_key(key, (char *)bin_key, bin_key_size);
>> +	if (ret < 0) {
> 
> This does the same commands regardless of whether it takes this branch.

ACK. Need remove 'if' code block here.

> 
>> +		up_read(&key->sem);
>> +		key_put(key);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	up_read(&key->sem);
>> +	key_put(key);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int inlinecrypt_get_key(const char *key_string,
>> +				u8 key[BLK_CRYPTO_MAX_ANY_KEY_SIZE],
>> +				const unsigned int key_size)
>> +{
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	/* ':' means the key is in kernel keyring, short-circuit normal key processing */
>> +	if (key_string[0] == ':') {
>> +		if (key_size > BLK_CRYPTO_MAX_ANY_KEY_SIZE) {
>> +			DMERR("Invalid keysize");
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +		}
>> +		/* key string should be :<logon|user>:<key_desc> */
>> +		ret = inlinecrypt_get_keyring_key(key_string + 1, key, key_size);
>> +		goto out;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (key_size > 2 * BLK_CRYPTO_MAX_ANY_KEY_SIZE
> 
> get_key_size() returns the size of the binary key in this case, so
> shouldn't this check for "key_size > BLK_CRYPTO_MAX_ANY_KEY_SIZE", and
> it seems like the check if the key_size is odd would make more sense in
> get_key_size().

Thanks for your insight!

ACK. Move the check if the key_size is odd into get_key_size() and only remains
this check for "key_size > BLK_CRYPTO_MAX_ANY_KEY_SIZE" here in this case.

> 
>> +		|| key_size  % 2
>> +		|| !key_size) {
>> +		DMERR("Invalid keysize");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +	if (hex2bin(key, key_string, key_size) != 0)
>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +out:
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int get_key_size(char **key_string)
>> +{
>> +	char *colon, dummy;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	if (*key_string[0] != ':')
>> +		return strlen(*key_string) >> 1;
>> +
>> +	/* look for next ':' in key string */
>> +	colon = strpbrk(*key_string + 1, ":");
>> +	if (!colon)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	if (sscanf(*key_string + 1, "%u%c", &ret, &dummy) != 2 || dummy != ':')
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	/* remaining key string should be :<logon|user>:<key_desc> */
>> +	*key_string = colon;
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int inlinecrypt_ctr_optional(struct dm_target *ti,
>> +				    unsigned int argc, char **argv)
>> +{
>> +	struct inlinecrypt_ctx *ctx = ti->private;
>> +	struct dm_arg_set as;
>> +	static const struct dm_arg _args[] = {
>> +		{0, 3, "Invalid number of feature args"},
>> +	};
>> +	unsigned int opt_params;
>> +	const char *opt_string;
>> +	bool iv_large_sectors = false;
>> +	char dummy;
>> +	int err;
>> +
>> +	as.argc = argc;
>> +	as.argv = argv;
>> +
>> +	err = dm_read_arg_group(_args, &as, &opt_params, &ti->error);
>> +	if (err)
>> +		return err;
>> +
>> +	while (opt_params--) {
>> +		opt_string = dm_shift_arg(&as);
>> +		if (!opt_string) {
>> +			ti->error = "Not enough feature arguments";
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +		}
>> +		if (!strcmp(opt_string, "allow_discards")) {
>> +			ti->num_discard_bios = 1;
>> +		} else if (sscanf(opt_string, "sector_size:%u%c",
>> +				  &ctx->sector_size, &dummy) == 1) {
>> +			if (ctx->sector_size < SECTOR_SIZE ||
>> +			    ctx->sector_size > 4096 ||
>> +			    !is_power_of_2(ctx->sector_size)) {
>> +				ti->error = "Invalid sector_size";
>> +				return -EINVAL;
>> +			}
>> +		} else if (!strcmp(opt_string, "iv_large_sectors")) {
>> +			iv_large_sectors = true;
>> +		} else {
>> +			ti->error = "Invalid feature arguments";
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* dm-inlinecrypt doesn't implement iv_large_sectors=false. */
>> +	if (ctx->sector_size != SECTOR_SIZE && !iv_large_sectors) {
>> +		ti->error = "iv_large_sectors must be specified";
> 
> Since setting sector_size forces setting iv_large_sectors, does it
> really need to be a separate parameter? Can't it just be implied by
> setting a non-512 sector_size. Is this here to futureproof the table
> line?

Thanks for your question!
Although a non-512 sector_size effectively requires large-sector IV semantics
for dm-inlinecrypt, iv_large_sectors is intentionally kept as an explicit table
parameter.

iv_large_sectors affects IV generation and the on-disk encryption format.
Inferring it from sector_size would silently change encryption semantics and
could break compatibility with existing data. Requiring it to be explicitly
specified forces userspace to consciously opt into the correct IV behavior,
rather than having it implied or overridden internally.

> 
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Construct an inlinecrypt mapping:
>> + * <cipher> [<key>|:<key_size>:<logon>:<key_description>] <iv_offset> <dev_path> <start>
>> + *
>> + * This syntax matches dm-crypt's, but the set of supported functionality has
>> + * been stripped down.
>> + */
>> +static int inlinecrypt_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv)
>> +{
>> +	struct inlinecrypt_ctx *ctx;
>> +	const struct dm_inlinecrypt_cipher *cipher;
>> +	u8 raw_key[BLK_CRYPTO_MAX_ANY_KEY_SIZE];
>> +	unsigned int dun_bytes;
>> +	unsigned long long tmpll;
>> +	char dummy;
>> +	int err;
>> +
>> +	if (argc < 5) {
>> +		ti->error = "Not enough arguments";
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ctx = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!ctx) {
>> +		ti->error = "Out of memory";
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +	}
>> +	ti->private = ctx;
>> +
>> +	/* <cipher> */
>> +	ctx->cipher_string = kstrdup(argv[0], GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!ctx->cipher_string) {
>> +		ti->error = "Out of memory";
>> +		err = -ENOMEM;
>> +		goto bad;
>> +	}
>> +	cipher = lookup_cipher(ctx->cipher_string);
>> +	if (!cipher) {
>> +		ti->error = "Unsupported cipher";
>> +		err = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto bad;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* <key> */
>> +	ctx->key_size = get_key_size(&argv[1]);
>> +	if (ctx->key_size < 0) {
>> +		ti->error = "Cannot parse key size";
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +	err = inlinecrypt_get_key(argv[1], raw_key, ctx->key_size);
>> +	if (err) {
>> +		ti->error = "Malformed key string";
>> +		goto bad;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* <iv_offset> */
>> +	if (sscanf(argv[2], "%llu%c", &ctx->iv_offset, &dummy) != 1) {
>> +		ti->error = "Invalid iv_offset sector";
>> +		err = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto bad;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* <dev_path> */
>> +	err = dm_get_device(ti, argv[3], dm_table_get_mode(ti->table),
>> +			    &ctx->dev);
>> +	if (err) {
>> +		ti->error = "Device lookup failed";
>> +		goto bad;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* <start> */
>> +	if (sscanf(argv[4], "%llu%c", &tmpll, &dummy) != 1 ||
>> +	    tmpll != (sector_t)tmpll) {
>> +		ti->error = "Invalid start sector";
>> +		err = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto bad;
>> +	}
>> +	ctx->start = tmpll;
>> +
>> +	/* optional arguments */
>> +	ctx->sector_size = SECTOR_SIZE;
>> +	if (argc > 5) {
>> +		err = inlinecrypt_ctr_optional(ti, argc - 5, &argv[5]);
>> +		if (err)
>> +			goto bad;
>> +	}
>> +	ctx->sector_bits = ilog2(ctx->sector_size);
>> +	if (ti->len & ((ctx->sector_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT) - 1)) {
>> +		ti->error = "Device size is not a multiple of sector_size";
>> +		err = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto bad;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ctx->max_dun = (ctx->iv_offset + ti->len - 1) >>
>> +		       (ctx->sector_bits - SECTOR_SHIFT);
>> +	dun_bytes = DIV_ROUND_UP(fls64(ctx->max_dun), 8);
>> +
>> +	err = blk_crypto_init_key(&ctx->key, raw_key, ctx->key_size,
>> +				  BLK_CRYPTO_KEY_TYPE_RAW,
>> +				  cipher->mode_num, dun_bytes,
>> +				  ctx->sector_size);
>> +	if (err) {
>> +		ti->error = "Error initializing blk-crypto key";
>> +		goto bad;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	err = blk_crypto_start_using_key(ctx->dev->bdev, &ctx->key);
>> +	if (err) {
>> +		ti->error = "Error starting to use blk-crypto";
>> +		goto bad;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ti->num_flush_bios = 1;
>> +
>> +	err = 0;
>> +	goto out;
>> +
>> +bad:
>> +	inlinecrypt_dtr(ti);
>> +out:
>> +	memzero_explicit(raw_key, sizeof(raw_key));
>> +	return err;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int inlinecrypt_map(struct dm_target *ti, struct bio *bio)
>> +{
>> +	const struct inlinecrypt_ctx *ctx = ti->private;
>> +	sector_t sector_in_target;
>> +	u64 dun[BLK_CRYPTO_DUN_ARRAY_SIZE] = {};
>> +
>> +	bio_set_dev(bio, ctx->dev->bdev);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * If the bio is a device-level request which doesn't target a specific
>> +	 * sector, there's nothing more to do.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (bio_sectors(bio) == 0)
>> +		return DM_MAPIO_REMAPPED;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * The bio should never have an encryption context already, since
>> +	 * dm-inlinecrypt doesn't pass through any inline encryption
>> +	 * capabilities to the layer above it.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bio_has_crypt_ctx(bio)))
>> +		return DM_MAPIO_KILL;
>> +
>> +	/* Map the bio's sector to the underlying device. (512-byte sectors) */
>> +	sector_in_target = dm_target_offset(ti, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
>> +	bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = ctx->start + sector_in_target;
>> +	/*
>> +	 * If the bio doesn't have any data (e.g. if it's a DISCARD request),
>> +	 * there's nothing more to do.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!bio_has_data(bio))
>> +		return DM_MAPIO_REMAPPED;
>> +
>> +	/* Calculate the DUN and enforce data-unit (crypto sector) alignment. */
>> +	dun[0] = ctx->iv_offset + sector_in_target; /* 512-byte sectors */
>> +	if (dun[0] & ((ctx->sector_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT) - 1))
>> +		return DM_MAPIO_KILL;
> 
> If ctx->iv_offset is not a multiple of ctx->sector_size, this will
> always fail. ctx->iv_offset should probably get validated in
> inlinecrypt_ctr()

ACK

Yes, this assumes iv_offset is aligned to sector_size when large crypto
sectors are used. That’s a requirement of dm-inlinecrypt semantics, and
adding an explicit check in inlinecrypt_ctr() would make this fail earlier
and more clearly.

> 
> -Ben
> 
>> +	dun[0] >>= ctx->sector_bits - SECTOR_SHIFT; /* crypto sectors */
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * This check isn't necessary as we should have calculated max_dun
>> +	 * correctly, but be safe.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dun[0] > ctx->max_dun))
>> +		return DM_MAPIO_KILL;
>> +
>> +	bio_crypt_set_ctx(bio, &ctx->key, dun, GFP_NOIO);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Since we've added an encryption context to the bio and
>> +	 * blk-crypto-fallback may be needed to process it, it's necessary to
>> +	 * use the fallback-aware bio submission code rather than
>> +	 * unconditionally returning DM_MAPIO_REMAPPED.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * To get the correct accounting for a dm target in the case where
>> +	 * __blk_crypto_submit_bio() doesn't take ownership of the bio (returns
>> +	 * true), call __blk_crypto_submit_bio() directly and return
>> +	 * DM_MAPIO_REMAPPED in that case, rather than relying on
>> +	 * blk_crypto_submit_bio() which calls submit_bio() in that case.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (__blk_crypto_submit_bio(bio))
>> +		return DM_MAPIO_REMAPPED;
>> +	return DM_MAPIO_SUBMITTED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void inlinecrypt_status(struct dm_target *ti, status_type_t type,
>> +			       unsigned int status_flags, char *result,
>> +			       unsigned int maxlen)
>> +{
>> +	const struct inlinecrypt_ctx *ctx = ti->private;
>> +	unsigned int sz = 0;
>> +	int num_feature_args = 0;
>> +
>> +	switch (type) {
>> +	case STATUSTYPE_INFO:
>> +	case STATUSTYPE_IMA:
>> +		result[0] = '\0';
>> +		break;
>> +
>> +	case STATUSTYPE_TABLE:
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Warning: like dm-crypt, dm-inlinecrypt includes the key in
>> +		 * the returned table.  Userspace is responsible for redacting
>> +		 * the key when needed.
>> +		 */
>> +		DMEMIT("%s %*phN %llu %s %llu", ctx->cipher_string,
>> +		       ctx->key.size, ctx->key.bytes, ctx->iv_offset,
>> +		       ctx->dev->name, ctx->start);
>> +		num_feature_args += !!ti->num_discard_bios;
>> +		if (ctx->sector_size != SECTOR_SIZE)
>> +			num_feature_args += 2;
>> +		if (num_feature_args != 0) {
>> +			DMEMIT(" %d", num_feature_args);
>> +			if (ti->num_discard_bios)
>> +				DMEMIT(" allow_discards");
>> +			if (ctx->sector_size != SECTOR_SIZE) {
>> +				DMEMIT(" sector_size:%u", ctx->sector_size);
>> +				DMEMIT(" iv_large_sectors");
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +		break;
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int inlinecrypt_prepare_ioctl(struct dm_target *ti,
>> +				     struct block_device **bdev, unsigned int cmd,
>> +				     unsigned long arg, bool *forward)
>> +{
>> +	const struct inlinecrypt_ctx *ctx = ti->private;
>> +	const struct dm_dev *dev = ctx->dev;
>> +
>> +	*bdev = dev->bdev;
>> +
>> +	/* Only pass ioctls through if the device sizes match exactly. */
>> +	return ctx->start != 0 || ti->len != bdev_nr_sectors(dev->bdev);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int inlinecrypt_iterate_devices(struct dm_target *ti,
>> +				       iterate_devices_callout_fn fn,
>> +				       void *data)
>> +{
>> +	const struct inlinecrypt_ctx *ctx = ti->private;
>> +
>> +	return fn(ti, ctx->dev, ctx->start, ti->len, data);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
>> +static int inlinecrypt_report_zones(struct dm_target *ti,
>> +				    struct dm_report_zones_args *args,
>> +				    unsigned int nr_zones)
>> +{
>> +	const struct inlinecrypt_ctx *ctx = ti->private;
>> +
>> +	return dm_report_zones(ctx->dev->bdev, ctx->start,
>> +			ctx->start + dm_target_offset(ti, args->next_sector),
>> +			args, nr_zones);
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +#define inlinecrypt_report_zones NULL
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static void inlinecrypt_io_hints(struct dm_target *ti,
>> +				 struct queue_limits *limits)
>> +{
>> +	const struct inlinecrypt_ctx *ctx = ti->private;
>> +	const unsigned int sector_size = ctx->sector_size;
>> +
>> +	limits->logical_block_size =
>> +		max_t(unsigned int, limits->logical_block_size, sector_size);
>> +	limits->physical_block_size =
>> +		max_t(unsigned int, limits->physical_block_size, sector_size);
>> +	limits->io_min = max_t(unsigned int, limits->io_min, sector_size);
>> +	limits->dma_alignment = limits->logical_block_size - 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct target_type inlinecrypt_target = {
>> +	.name			= "inlinecrypt",
>> +	.version		= {1, 0, 0},
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Do not set DM_TARGET_PASSES_CRYPTO, since dm-inlinecrypt consumes the
>> +	 * crypto capability itself.
>> +	 */
>> +	.features		= DM_TARGET_ZONED_HM,
>> +	.module			= THIS_MODULE,
>> +	.ctr			= inlinecrypt_ctr,
>> +	.dtr			= inlinecrypt_dtr,
>> +	.map			= inlinecrypt_map,
>> +	.status			= inlinecrypt_status,
>> +	.prepare_ioctl		= inlinecrypt_prepare_ioctl,
>> +	.iterate_devices	= inlinecrypt_iterate_devices,
>> +	.report_zones		= inlinecrypt_report_zones,
>> +	.io_hints		= inlinecrypt_io_hints,
>> +};
>> +
>> +module_dm(inlinecrypt);
>> +
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Linlin Zhang <linlin.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION(DM_NAME " target for inline encryption");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-27 12:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-10 13:40 [PATCH v2 0/3] dm-inlinecrypt: add target for inline block device encryption Linlin Zhang
2026-04-10 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] block: export blk-crypto symbols required by dm-inlinecrypt Linlin Zhang
2026-04-10 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dm-inlinecrypt: add target for inline block device encryption Linlin Zhang
2026-04-27  1:19   ` Benjamin Marzinski
2026-04-27 12:20     ` Linlin Zhang [this message]
2026-04-28 10:43       ` Linlin Zhang
2026-04-28 16:20         ` Benjamin Marzinski
2026-04-29 12:16           ` Linlin Zhang
2026-04-27  5:23   ` Benjamin Marzinski
2026-04-27 23:21     ` Benjamin Marzinski
2026-04-28  9:20       ` Linlin Zhang
2026-04-28 16:36         ` Benjamin Marzinski
2026-04-29 12:34           ` Linlin Zhang
2026-04-29 15:25             ` Benjamin Marzinski
2026-04-29 15:58               ` Benjamin Marzinski
2026-04-30  9:21                 ` Linlin Zhang
2026-04-10 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] dm: add documentation for dm-inlinecrypt target Linlin Zhang
2026-04-10 17:07   ` Milan Broz
2026-04-24 13:53     ` Linlin Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=af84cfb7-b673-404a-a7f9-6efd9d23a08f@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=linlin.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=adrianvovk@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=israelr@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=quic_mdalam@quicinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox