From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0AAA1D5CFE; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 00:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782867325; cv=none; b=fGrsr4qYPoiiYAQzLwAZM1CfWROZn0R3ZgDU/vV3JhZVhCw4uv1b5Juyx2zlcQwwfSkCSaOalC6aWn8J2KjQ46YeCBNDoxe7plHkjTCbkybSblTK0q2d2N+WkIkEjf5YBS1ip/Y9RYBuFor0aAPFQKLtMrmj9+O9O34X1mFkrDo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782867325; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9Z9ArON/QE5u8rhZr1EjOO8ZsX628W+KI6v6x5rZZx8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Nqmi4S12r79vso0b3zhGCn78kkVYUTI0IoEiCVQ3lpXFC3V4xicxgqXlsXvnVf1exCuoVbRE92xBuLAx4PwdmJYNUu0X+afqYtmH9JiG3azZLw+PlDU3gUp+UTIg6vLgCPK9x1HYq+2ZuITXVYCFDfHnhZEc3QSpG4CCTJzFjrM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=eZ7L5Dg7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="eZ7L5Dg7" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE22A1F000E9; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 00:55:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1782867324; bh=jvGSubRhLRrfQ1Bx0YzokVu5xaLPDT8+PK7Fx2Fmv6Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=eZ7L5Dg7bX49psz4qjSk4Khp8OAhc4kVhEkRG1PWaPJk5GpugpbYn5ZZ8e7wyrfyy LfcZSiq33O/rJMOkZEkGkGXcksVrUhecvtntn9J9w/PKK/Jbw6LuiiOQkyfOCoHnu4 doB0xjnZNcWqr1RPdASTY8Ip6AfxtPtZadiqiXV04oO9wrJL8NoRz50MoxK2YVITgw TFhWcEGpKAL9XW0t4OGfbS9CstGO0npV6ev5jB4xYIpjx08oPwff41REc9t0T/cnLD BnrnNTvVHxq14TbQWfBUPaH6b7uK/WzgUV88R7eq32rxQ9Dv4F4x/KB+ZJ1Iv0Umbg jDOrk/lrDqlCQ== Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 18:55:22 -0600 From: Keith Busch To: Joanne Koong Cc: brauner@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, djwong@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , "open list:BLOCK LAYER" , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/18] block: convert iomap ops to ->iomap_next() Message-ID: References: <20260701000949.1666714-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com> <20260701000949.1666714-11-joannelkoong@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260701000949.1666714-11-joannelkoong@gmail.com> On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 05:09:25PM -0700, Joanne Koong wrote: > static const struct iomap_ops blkdev_iomap_ops = { > - .iomap_begin = blkdev_iomap_begin, > + .iomap_next = blkdev_iomap_next, > }; I think it's generally safe to use the same mailing list for the entire series. There's no context here on what "iomap_next" is because I'm subscribed only to linux-block. I found the rest here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20260701000949.1666714-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/ FWIW, everything looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Keith Busch