From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44D262E2F0E; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 20:03:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785355390; cv=none; b=lLIX+jgLeBS3ZSyzQNuUeQpPkfPLINXVK1OSwR3Ay/5sDoz8QE2aVL+pXjNknrY+TnKzq/0ob6uhJgoo87bkibtd2H0umO8zPAuTY1CIFFV/5bpYeQjXfUjrA/w0WvE1rhN6tBEOBjLr8qeWLEO/RPOQ7jmj7FdUWUMtbU7aAdE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785355390; c=relaxed/simple; bh=p4KQgminFFewplGRKbGvY99DLbBsmXYppsmO7++5T7w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ck0F06qYfDuF08lOLayQoMFvqQI1Fut3xkqBzpkQ4nlnTjMnIJXqWCXQ5j8KUsMIWBg1SawxRCZW5zkSQJeGTrrBot5i8PJSe2nUJqmyjBNPEY5BVCAzHbvyAd14v1ygDVqdtWf+oTAL5UlUOxjMP+hYQpMO1CM3Y5XBjHCqgJ0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=NjNVoXWq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NjNVoXWq" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FE9B1F000E9; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 20:03:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785355389; bh=jml1C2l2PIIYHTPrel4zGWOzano3z0M7hg3hSJOdhFs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=NjNVoXWq5M+G2c52xvJAPqSQ8lDAxp9yLtJETJD8EFKATGXlaUi0rNbHHQjCyK+a+ kXDauYs2gJ6sm06Q3ZcaY5aOBl1NTyebFTzm+A/93y7HkgSJuO8XbCD5XHAycGYKSZ EQzKJ7MTtlmDD85Lpp+GsWIKosezTzMfAypRd+N6FRJNtVlKfZTR+c+sf280cJmnfN tjad712+CxEnQbE0iRTshSytX8qDhMPvc1oh6zX9Yk37L/SnO2BkEneT7oAy4PItek MaRt29yB0it8JBrsTFF+sibFEBB7kqyakP5W6iOSbLp8wqsF+vyKsNUeXrvJD1ywYa mSQygJefCcjOw== Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:03:07 -0600 From: Keith Busch To: Jens Axboe Cc: Keith Busch , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, hch@lst.de, brauner@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/5] block: validate direct I/O memory alignment Message-ID: References: <20260720201057.1862857-1-kbusch@meta.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 01:18:40PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 7/29/26 1:15 PM, Keith Busch wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 01:10:52PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote: > >> This addresses the misaligned direct-io problem behind various threads: > > > > Hi Jens, have you had a chance to look at this one yet? This addresses > > previous issues with certain device mappers under direct io. > > I they look fine, but at this point we should toss them into 7.3. Yes > I know there are regressions around this, but from 6.1x days. And the > series doesn't apply to the current block-7.2 anyway. This series is kind of old at this point, but yes, it's not fixing a new regression either. I'm okay if this goes to the next window, and I will handle the stable follow-up. Are you planning to start the for-7.3/block branch soon? I can rebase the series if there's a conflict, and would be great to get this exposed to linux-next.