Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
	Yue Hu <zbestahu@gmail.com>,
	Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Sandeep Dhavale <dhavale@google.com>,
	Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>,
	Chunhai Guo <guochunhai@vivo.com>, Dave Chinner <dgc@kernel.org>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] iomap: use BIO_COMPLETE_IN_TASK for dropbehind writeback
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 01:13:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <amsHrVCJnuXzeGG1@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260730-blk-dontcache-v7-3-3e8e6850068d@columbia.edu>

On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 02:57:53AM -0400, Tal Zussman wrote:
> Set BIO_COMPLETE_IN_TASK on iomap writeback bios when a dropbehind folio
> is added. This ensures that bi_end_io runs in task context, where
> folio_end_dropbehind() can safely invalidate folios.
> 
> With the bio layer now handling task-context deferral generically,
> IOMAP_IOEND_DONTCACHE is no longer needed, as XFS no longer needs to
> route DONTCACHE ioends through its completion workqueue. Remove the flag
> and its NOMERGE entry.
> 
> Without the NOMERGE, regular I/Os that get merged with a dropbehind
> folio will also have their completion deferred to task context.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>

This seems to be missing the bug fix you identified for the double
deferral?

I although thought a bit how that could be done cleaner, see below:

>  		ioend_flags |= IOMAP_IOEND_SHARED;
> -	if (folio_test_dropbehind(folio))
> -		ioend_flags |= IOMAP_IOEND_DONTCACHE;

I'd keep this flag.

>  	if (pos == wpc->iomap.offset && (wpc->iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_BOUNDARY))
>  		ioend_flags |= IOMAP_IOEND_BOUNDARY;
>  
> @@ -256,6 +254,9 @@ ssize_t iomap_add_to_ioend(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc, struct folio *folio,
>  	if (!bio_add_folio(&ioend->io_bio, folio, map_len, poff))
>  		goto new_ioend;
>  
> +	if (folio_test_dropbehind(folio))
> +		bio_set_flag(&ioend->io_bio, BIO_COMPLETE_IN_TASK);

And move setting the flag to iomap_ioend_writeback_submit, and only
for the case where no io_bio.bi_end_io is already assigned.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-30  8:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-30  6:57 [PATCH v7 0/5] block: enable RWF_DONTCACHE for block devices Tal Zussman
2026-07-30  6:57 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] block: introduce bio_in_atomic() Tal Zussman
2026-07-30  8:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-30  9:02   ` Jan Kara
2026-07-30  6:57 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] block: add task-context bio completion infrastructure Tal Zussman
2026-07-30  8:09   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-30  9:29   ` Jan Kara
2026-07-30  6:57 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] iomap: use BIO_COMPLETE_IN_TASK for dropbehind writeback Tal Zussman
2026-07-30  8:13   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-07-30  6:57 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] buffer: set " Tal Zussman
2026-07-30  9:31   ` Jan Kara
2026-07-30  6:57 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] block: enable RWF_DONTCACHE for block devices Tal Zussman
2026-07-30  9:33   ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=amsHrVCJnuXzeGG1@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=dgc@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhavale@google.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=guochunhai@vivo.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=lihongbo22@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tz2294@columbia.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=xiang@kernel.org \
    --cc=zbestahu@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox