Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: blktests-ci-bot@kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: remove support for swapping loop fds
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 17:47:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <as8-8rDJmUb1FxbP@shinmob> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49a2d2f1d44a018dbe2a3da155b5fedea30cf98ea484bdc19da2f9cf97c4e0da@mailrelay.wdc.com>

On Oct 13, 2026 / 16:03, shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com wrote:
> Dear patch submitter,
> 
> Blktests CI has tested the following submission:
> Status:     FAILURE
> Name:       loop: remove support for swapping loop fds

This kernel patch removed the support of ioctl LOOP_CHANGE_FD.

> Patchwork:  https://patchwork.kernel.org/series/1183887/&state=*
> Run record: https://github.com/linux-blktests/linux-block/actions/runs/38278109458
> 
> 
> Failed test cases: loop/006

And this test case confirms that the ioctl LOOP_CHANGE_FD works well. After
removing the ioctl, the test case failure is expected. Blktests CI caught it,
and reported it with this e-mail.

The test case loop/006 is no longer valid, and its failure should be handled.
I can think of two action candidates:

  1) just remove the test case loop/006
  2) skip the test case for kernel versions larger than v7.4, and keep it for
     older kernel versions

The ioctl has been broken for certain period, so I think action 1) is more
appropriate. If anyone has different opinion, please share. Otherwise, I will
post a patch to remove loop/006.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-14  8:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-12 12:47 [PATCH] loop: remove support for swapping loop fds Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 16:19 ` Jan Kara
2026-10-12 18:51 ` Jens Axboe
2026-10-13 23:03 ` shinichiro.kawasaki
2026-10-14  8:47   ` Shin'ichiro Kawasaki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=as8-8rDJmUb1FxbP@shinmob \
    --to=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=blktests-ci-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox