Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Cc: Yoav Cohen <yoav@nvidia.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, jholzman@nvidia.com,
	omril@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ublk: honor rq_affinity on request completion
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 08:43:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <asjveZylpV0swnp8@fedora-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADUfDZrX7v+0-Zxv7AwoJBH-e0ohLcAgm_dvPoDpGv2jZfN2XA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 02:53:47PM -0700, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2026 at 12:04 PM Yoav Cohen <yoav@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> > ublk ends successfully completed requests inline on the server thread
> > that issued UBLK_IO_COMMIT_AND_FETCH_REQ, so rq_affinity never
> > redirects completion back to the submitting CPU, unlike NVMe, SCSI,
> > virtio-blk, loop, nbd and rnbd.
> >
> > Route completion through blk_mq_complete_request_remote(), with a new
> > ->complete() callback, ublk_end_rq(). This covers every completion
> > outcome -- reads, writes, flush/discard, errors, and the zero-copy/
> > user-copy/auto-buf-reg/shmem-zc paths that skip the copy-back step --
> > not just the classic-copy-mode successful-read case, since
> > ublk_end_rq() re-derives which of those __ublk_complete_rq() took from
> > @req and @io state rather than assuming one.
> >
> > Gate it behind a new UBLK_F_SUPPORT_RQ_AFFINITY flag that a server
> > must request at ADD_DEV time; servers that don't ask for it keep
> > today's always-local completion unchanged. Add ublk_support_rq_affinity()
> > alongside the existing ublk_support_*() helpers, and check it before
> > calling blk_mq_complete_request_remote() at both call sites.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yoav Cohen <yoav@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/block/ublk_drv.c      | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h |  8 +++
> >  2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> > index 66eb55e7162e..b94293296b73 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> > @@ -90,7 +90,8 @@
> >                 | UBLK_F_BATCH_IO \
> >                 | UBLK_F_NO_AUTO_PART_SCAN \
> >                 | UBLK_F_SHMEM_ZC \
> > -               | UBLK_F_IO_DESC_SIZE)
> > +               | UBLK_F_IO_DESC_SIZE \
> > +               | UBLK_F_SUPPORT_RQ_AFFINITY)
> >
> >  #define UBLK_F_ALL_RECOVERY_FLAGS (UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY \
> >                 | UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_REISSUE \
> > @@ -452,6 +453,11 @@ static inline bool ublk_support_user_copy(const struct ublk_queue *ubq)
> >         return ubq->flags & UBLK_F_USER_COPY;
> >  }
> >
> > +static inline bool ublk_support_rq_affinity(const struct ublk_queue *ubq)
> > +{
> > +       return ubq->flags & UBLK_F_SUPPORT_RQ_AFFINITY;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static inline bool ublk_dev_support_user_copy(const struct ublk_device *ub)
> >  {
> >         return ub->dev_info.flags & UBLK_F_USER_COPY;
> > @@ -1468,6 +1474,14 @@ static inline bool ublk_need_unmap_req(const struct request *req)
> >                (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_READ || req_op(req) == REQ_OP_DRV_IN);
> >  }
> >
> > +/* Whether __ublk_complete_rq() takes the copy-back/partial-completion path */
> > +static inline bool ublk_rq_need_unmap(const struct ublk_queue *ubq,
> > +                                     struct request *req)
> > +{
> > +       return ublk_need_map_io(ubq) && ublk_need_unmap_req(req) &&
> > +              !ublk_iod_is_shmem_zc(ubq, req->tag);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static unsigned int ublk_map_io(const struct request *req,
> >                                 const struct ublk_io *io)
> >  {
> > @@ -1549,13 +1563,62 @@ static void ublk_end_request(struct request *req, blk_status_t error)
> >         local_bh_enable();
> >  }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Update @req with its result and requeue it if it was only partially
> > + * completed. Returns true if @req was requeued, in which case the caller
> > + * must not touch it any further.
> > + *
> > + * Run bio->bi_end_io() with softirqs disabled. If the final fput happens
> > + * off this path, then that will prevent ublk's blkdev_release() from
> > + * being called on current's task work, see fput() implementation.
> > + *
> > + * This matters for the caller completing @req locally on the ublk
> > + * server's own thread: it may already be holding disk->open_mutex, e.g.
> > + * reading the partition table from bdev_open(), and an fput() running
> > + * inline there could deadlock on it. Preferably we would not be doing
> > + * IO with a mutex held that is also used for release, but this
> > + * work-around will suffice for now. A caller reached instead via
> > + * blk_mq_complete_request_remote()'s softirq/IPI redirect never runs on
> > + * that thread, so it isn't exposed to this hazard, but disabling
> > + * softirqs here is harmless for it too.
> > + */
> > +static inline bool ublk_update_and_requeue(struct request *req,
> > +                                          struct ublk_io *io)
> > +{
> > +       bool requeue;
> > +
> > +       local_bh_disable();
> > +       requeue = blk_update_request(req, BLK_STS_OK, io->res);
> > +       local_bh_enable();
> > +       if (requeue)
> > +               blk_mq_requeue_request(req, true);
> > +       return requeue;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ublk_end_rq(struct request *req)
> > +{
> > +       struct ublk_queue *ubq = req->mq_hctx->driver_data;
> > +       struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[req->tag];
> > +
> > +       /* matches the two outcomes __ublk_complete_rq() may have redirected */
> > +       if (io->res >= 0 && ublk_rq_need_unmap(ubq, req)) {
> > +               if (!ublk_update_and_requeue(req, io) &&
> > +                   likely(!blk_should_fake_timeout(req->q)))
> > +                       __blk_mq_end_request(req, BLK_STS_OK);
> > +               return;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       ublk_end_request(req, io->res < 0 ? errno_to_blk_status(io->res) :
> > +                                           BLK_STS_OK);
> > +}
> > +
> >  /* todo: handle partial completion */
> >  static inline void __ublk_complete_rq(struct request *req, struct ublk_io *io,
> >                                       bool need_map, struct io_comp_batch *iob)
> >  {
> > +       struct ublk_queue *ubq = req->mq_hctx->driver_data;
> 
> mq_hctx->driver_data and ubq->flags are likely to both be cache misses
> on a ublk server thread servicing many queues. req->mq_hctx is
> probably a hit as it's in the same cache line as req->cmd_flags
> accessed just before in ublk_ch_uring_cmd_local() for the req_op(req)
> == REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND check. It would be nice to avoid these
> additional dereferences, can we prevent queue_rq_affinity_store() from
> setting rq_affinity to a value other than 0 if
> UBLK_F_SUPPORT_RQ_AFFINITY isn't enabled? Perhaps indicated via a new
> BLK_FEAT_SUPPORTS_RQ_AFFINITY flag in struct queue_limits's features
> field?

ubq is only for ublk_support_rq_affinity(ubq), `maybe rq_affinity` can be
passed by __ublk_complete_rq() parameter via
ublk_dev_support_rq_affinity(ub).

BTW, the one for ublk_iod_is_shmem_zc() can't be avoided.


Thanks,
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-09 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-06 19:03 [PATCH v2 0/2] ublk: honor rq_affinity on request completion Yoav Cohen
2026-10-06 19:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Yoav Cohen
2026-10-06 21:53   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-10-09 13:43     ` Ming Lei [this message]
2026-10-09 15:25       ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-10-09 14:04   ` Ming Lei
2026-10-06 19:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests: ublk: add rq_affinity test Yoav Cohen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=asjveZylpV0swnp8@fedora-laptop \
    --to=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=csander@purestorage.com \
    --cc=jholzman@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=omril@nvidia.com \
    --cc=yoav@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox