public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
	"nilay@linux.ibm.com" <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests] nvme/068: add a test for multipath delayed removal
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 14:03:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b00f7f6d-278f-457e-9151-7528ef7d61b4@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aeDYE1BfumNvutvS@shinmob>

On 16/04/2026 13:50, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2026 / 10:41, John Garry wrote:
>> For NVMe multipath, the delayed removal feature allows the multipath
>> gendisk to remain present when all available paths are gone. The purpose of
>> this feature is to ensure that we keep the gendisk for intermittent path
>> failures.
>>
>> The delayed removal works on a timer - when all paths are gone, a timer is
>> kicked off; once the timer expires and no paths have returned, the gendisk
>> is removed.
>>
>> When all paths are gone and the gendisk is still present, all reads and
>> writes to the disk are queued. If a path returns before the timer
>> expiration, the timer canceled and the queued IO is submitted;
>> otherwise they fail when the timer expires.
>>
>> This testcase covers two scenarios in separate parts:
>> a. test that IOs submitted after all paths are removed (and do not return)
>>     fail
>> b. test that IOs submitted between all paths removed and a path
>>     returning succeed
>>
>> During the period of the timer being active, it must be ensured that the
>> nvme-core module is not removed. Otherwise the driver may not be present
>> to handle the timeout expiry. The kernel ensures this by taking a
>> reference to the module. Ideally, we would try to remove the module during
>> this test to prove that this is not possible (and the kernel behaves as
>> expected), but that module will probably not be removable anyway due to
>> many references. To test this feature, check that the refcount of the
>> nvme-core module is incremented when the delayed timer is active.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> 
> John, thanks for the patch. When I ran the new test case in my test environment,
> it failed. The reported refcount mismatch looks happening in the Part b.
> 
> nvme/068 (tr=loop) (NVMe multipath delayed removal test)     [failed]
>      runtime  38.579s  ...  38.770s
>      --- tests/nvme/068.out      2026-04-16 20:50:21.228000000 +0900
>      +++ /home/shin/Blktests/blktests/results/nodev_tr_loop/nvme/068.out.bad     2026-04-16 21:30:36.215000000 +0900
>      @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
>       Running nvme/068
>       pwrite: Input/output error
>      +module refcount not as original
>       Test complete
> 
> I have no idea why it fails. Do you have any guess about the failure cause?

I posted a fix for this here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20260416051459.GA14802@lst.de/T/#m17eb549aba102198009a37621cb45775841639d9

I should have mentioned this when posting this patch.

About this specific part of the test (checking module refcnt), I was 
wondering if we should be testing kernel internals like this. But, since 
it found a problem, I suppose that makes it ok :)

> 
> Also, please find my review comments in line.

ok

> 
>>
>> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
>> index 5350057..6eae0e2 100644
>> --- a/common/rc
>> +++ b/common/rc
>> @@ -117,6 +117,16 @@ _module_not_in_use() {
>>   	fi
>>   }
>>   
>> +_module_use_count() {
>> +	local refcnt
>> +	if [ -f "/sys/module/$1/refcnt" ]; then
>> +		refcnt="$(cat /sys/module/"$1"/refcnt)"
>> +		echo $refcnt
> 
> To suppress Shellcheck warning, please add quotation marks: "$refcnt".

ok

> 
>> +		return
>> +	fi
>> +	echo ""
>> +}
>> +
>>   _have_module_param() {
>>   	 _have_driver "$1" || return
>>   
>> diff --git a/tests/nvme/068 b/tests/nvme/068
>> new file mode 100644
> 
> File mode 755 is recommended for consistency.
> 

ok

>> index 0000000..e06fd6b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/nvme/068
>> @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
>> +#!/bin/bash
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0+
>> +# Copyright (C) 2026 John Garry
>> +#
>> +# Test NVMe multipath delayed removal works as expected
>> +
>> +. tests/nvme/rc
>> +. common/xfs
>> +
>> +DESCRIPTION="NVMe multipath delayed removal test"
>> +QUICK=1
> 
> It is guided to set QUICK=1 for the test cases which completes
> "in ~30 seconds or less". In my environment, this test case took 38
> seconds, so I'm not so sure if this test case is quick. How long
> does it take in your environment?

I think that I will drop this, as the test time run should be > 30 with 
the delays, below

> 
>> +
>> +requires() {
>> +	_nvme_requires
>> +	_have_loop
>> +	_have_module_param_value nvme_core multipath Y
>> +	_require_nvme_trtype_is_fabrics
>> +}
>> +
>> +set_conditions() {
>> +	_set_nvme_trtype "$@"
>> +}
>> +
>> +_delayed_nvme_reconnect_ctrl() {
>> +	sleep 5
>> +	_nvme_connect_subsys
>> +}
>> +
>> +test() {
>> +	echo "Running ${TEST_NAME}"
>> +
>> +	_setup_nvmet
>> +
>> +	local nvmedev
>> +	local ns
>> +	local bytes_written
>> +	local refcnt_orig
>> +	local refcnt
>> +	_nvmet_target_setup
>> +
>> +	_nvme_connect_subsys
>> +
>> +	# Part a: Prove that writes fail when no path returns. Any reads or
>> +	#	  writes are queued during the delayed removal period. If no
>> +	#	  paths return before the timer expires, then those IOs should
>> +	#	  fail.
>> +	#	  During the delayed removal period, ensure that the module
>> +	#	  refcnt is incremented, to prove that we cannot remove the
>> +	#	  driver during this period.
>> +	nvmedev=$(_find_nvme_dev "${def_subsysnqn}")
>> +	ns=$(_find_nvme_ns "${def_subsys_uuid}")
>> +	refcnt=$(_module_use_count nvme_core)
>> +	echo 10 > "/sys/block/"$ns"/delayed_removal_secs"
> 
> Shellcheck complains about the line above. I think it can be modified as below:
> 
> 	echo 10 > "/sys/block/${ns}/delayed_removal_secs"

ok, I'll check that

> 
>> +	refcnt_orig=$(_module_use_count nvme_core)
>> +	_nvme_disconnect_ctrl "${nvmedev}"
>> +	sleep 1
>> +	ns=$(_find_nvme_ns "${def_subsys_uuid}")
>> +	if [[ "${ns}" = "" ]]; then
>> +		echo "could not find ns after disconnect"
>> +	fi
>> +	refcnt=$(_module_use_count nvme_core)
>> +	if [ "$refcnt" != "" ] && [ "$refcnt" -le "$refcnt_orig" ]; then
>> +		echo "module refcount did not increase"
>> +	fi
>> +	bytes_written=$(run_xfs_io_pwritev2 /dev/"$ns" 4096)
>> +	if [ "$bytes_written" == 4096 ]; then
>> +		echo "wrote successfully after disconnect"
>> +	fi
>> +	sleep 10
>> +	ns=$(_find_nvme_ns "${def_subsys_uuid}")
>> +	if [[ !"${ns}" = "" ]]; then
> 
> Shellcheck warns the line above. I guess it can be as follows:
> 
> 	if [[ "${ns}" != "" ]]; then

ok, I'll check that

> 
>> +		echo "found ns after delayed removal"
>> +	fi
>> +	refcnt=$(_module_use_count nvme_core)
>> +	if [ "$refcnt" != "" ] && [ "$refcnt" -ne "$refcnt_orig" ]; then
>> +		echo "module refcount not as original"
>> +	fi
>> +
>> +	# Part b: Ensure writes for an intermittent disconnect are successful.
>> +	#	  During an intermittent disconnect, any reads or writes
>> +	#	  queued should succeed after a path returns.
>> +	#	  Also ensure module refcount behaviour is as expected, as
>> +	#	  above.
>> +	_nvme_connect_subsys
>> +
>> +	nvmedev=$(_find_nvme_dev "${def_subsysnqn}")
>> +	ns=$(_find_nvme_ns "${def_subsys_uuid}")
>> +	refcnt_orig=$(_module_use_count nvme_core)
>> +	echo 10 > "/sys/block/"$ns"/delayed_removal_secs"
> 
> Again, the line above can be modified as follows for Shellcheck.
> 

sure

> 	echo 10 > "/sys/block/${ns}/delayed_removal_secs"

Thanks,
John


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-16 13:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-15 10:41 [PATCH blktests] nvme/068: add a test for multipath delayed removal John Garry
2026-04-15 17:58 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2026-04-16 11:18 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-04-16 11:45   ` John Garry
2026-04-16 12:50 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2026-04-16 13:03   ` John Garry [this message]
2026-04-17  2:22     ` Shinichiro Kawasaki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b00f7f6d-278f-457e-9151-7528ef7d61b4@oracle.com \
    --to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox