Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>
Cc: josef@toxicopanda.com, axboe@kernel.dk, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, cuitao@kylinos.cn,
	ameryhung@gmail.com, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] selftests/bpf: add iocost cost model test
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 10:09:29 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b69d96a507aec382c279d62cfb038fa9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261028143534.135968-4-cui.tao@linux.dev>

Hello, Tao.

On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 10:35:32PM +0800, Tao Cui wrote:
> +static bool iocost_bpf_supported(void)
> +{
> +	FILE *f;
> +	char line[128];
> +	bool any = false, on = false;
> ...
> +		if (strstr(line, "CONFIG_"))
> +			any = true;
> ...
> +	return on;

any is set but never read, so every test skips without /proc/config.gz.

> +	/* isolate the configfs and cgroup mounts from the host */
> +	if (unshare(CLONE_NEWNS)) {

unshare(CLONE_NEWNS) alone doesn't make the mounts private, so the
configfs mount propagates to the host, one more per test.

> +	ASSERT_OK(configfs_write("/sys/fs/cgroup/cgroup.subtree_control",
> +				 "+io"), "subtree_io");
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK(cgroup_mkdir("/sys/fs/cgroup/iocost_pairing"),

The "+io" write to the root cgroup's cgroup.subtree_control is never
reverted, the cgroups are created directly under /sys/fs/cgroup and
test_progs stays in the root cgroup. cgroup_helpers handles all of this.

> +	err = iocost_model__attach(skel);
> +	if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP || err == -ENODEV) {
> ...
> +		test__skip();

-ENODEV and -EOPNOTSUPP from attaching to the test's own null_blk device
are failures, not skips. The same goes for
serial_test_iocost_model_streams().

> +		ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->iocg_inits, 0, "pair_init");

This passes on the root blkg alone, so it doesn't show that the test
cgroup got iocg_init(). The same goes for eject_had_inits and
pair_init_again.

> +		/*
> +		 * detach implicitly by closing the link fd instead of
> +		 * calling bpf_link__destroy() explicitly: the release
> +		 * path must detach the model just like the explicit
> +		 * call does
> +		 */
> +		lfd = bpf_link__fd(skel->links.iocost_2x);
> +		bpf_link__disconnect(skel->links.iocost_2x);
> +		close(lfd);
> +		skel->links.iocost_2x = NULL;

This leaks libbpf's link struct. The reason in the comment doesn't hold
either. bpf_link__destroy() on a struct_ops link does the same close().

> +void serial_test_iocost_model_streams(void)
> ...
> +	if (ASSERT_OK(err, "attach")) {
> +		err = readback_model(dev, model, sizeof(model));
> +		if (ASSERT_OK(err, "readback"))
> +			ASSERT_STREQ(model, "bpf", "model_bpf");
> +
> +		bpf_link__destroy(skel->links.iocost_ms);

The test never enables the controller, so iocost_ms's calc_cost() never
runs. The multi-stream results in the cover letter aren't exercised by
the test.

Thanks.

--
tejun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-28 20:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-28 14:35 [RFC PATCH v11 0/5] blk-iocost: BPF struct_ops cost model Tao Cui
2026-10-28 14:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] blk-iocost: move shared definitions to blk-iocost.h Tao Cui
2026-10-28 20:09   ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-29 10:04     ` Tao Cui
2026-10-28 14:35 ` [PATCH 2/5] blk-iocost: add BPF struct_ops cost model support Tao Cui
2026-10-28 15:33   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-28 20:09   ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-29 10:11     ` Tao Cui
2026-10-28 14:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] selftests/bpf: add iocost cost model test Tao Cui
2026-10-28 15:33   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-28 20:09   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-10-29 10:30     ` Tao Cui
2026-10-28 14:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] blk-iocost: add iocost_ioc_tick tracepoint for per-period device summary Tao Cui
2026-10-28 20:09   ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-29 10:31     ` Tao Cui
2026-10-28 14:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] docs: cgroup-v2: document the iocost BPF cost model attachment Tao Cui
2026-10-28 20:09   ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-29 10:33     ` Tao Cui
2026-10-28 15:58 ` [RFC PATCH v11 0/5] blk-iocost: BPF struct_ops cost model Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-28 20:09   ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-29  9:55   ` Tao Cui
2026-10-28 20:09 ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-29  9:57   ` Tao Cui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b69d96a507aec382c279d62cfb038fa9@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cui.tao@linux.dev \
    --cc=cuitao@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicopanda.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox