From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCDF23655CC for ; Wed, 20 May 2026 06:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779260206; cv=none; b=eS11ivzCOZWTbmGKpzZQn9ier51JikNyo4FML/GmFlvFSceoyOv+Vs3nBSAOFd9ba435gq/WhDvzKvRWjpkHlYLkgcSNRgnIwHFaWJJpeywQQaDFjAzg4+x/3PZnwhvNs+pYBxD1/MnTbfgDW/bHfFsCGSaVeeWPMjtYgSI17ro= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779260206; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9trSHzqhAbUFJgEBLCpBukjDW0+MO20AwASSbV+UI/k=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=L+SDiS1b8xKpI70f6tL0xhzkCchQu2aLM6cR5hKoV/BEMatsHUjjJygbjOZBwSP3xd+QyDJqs4t3Ni8k5061UzdXtVrTABkSmCsX+RdvvxHony+rsi1dj4G87/d1Db0aVMFm75zD1omFc0GmAO2X9A+PgkgQdBz3rQQKmCSMNp0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JoIPtbsd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JoIPtbsd" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 945361F000E9; Wed, 20 May 2026 06:56:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779260203; bh=PQyE2sjonzdzHK3b0QvSKBdcBtvd/iEDjOKguePEnKc=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=JoIPtbsd0F8vSjYNkhi/4yI0YDiqEe3rIRrtAcaLYw1SxJq9MKEhB2tqsOyoykvKO RboRy6tG7VU7/xGIowXy6BOfeOCoN3+wjXdcXFHDZc95sAlN2wBIwCakZsIxCihKDV AT2l8/wKWIY/9PljhZ/vpQHB4BFCOUo2dCi16afHvQi9Cn495ogqT/uBd5CVIfr9sQ LmeMMrp82HoujmJgf1eweDrYiaXrKxX3tSM9JMlr+N+6BUJzavTDW17mQ4JvnuWJVO mHku3ob61qnKa6XuXt0Z91jwYBsgft2zCxucTHWKxW54OhwzGeMO5crSKTyJGIxXsb ft6omnEu/yViA== Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 08:56:39 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/5] blk-mq: fix status for unaligned bio To: Keith Busch , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, tom.leiming@gmail.com, coshi036@gmail.com, Igor.Achkinazi@dell.com, Keith Busch References: <20260519172326.3462354-1-kbusch@meta.com> <20260519172326.3462354-2-kbusch@meta.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Damien Le Moal Organization: Western Digital Research In-Reply-To: <20260519172326.3462354-2-kbusch@meta.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2026/05/19 19:23, Keith Busch wrote: > From: Keith Busch > > A bio requesting sectors unaligned to the logical format is invalid > rather than an IO error. Fix up the return code because there are some > device mappers that care about distinguishing these kinds of errors. > > Signed-off-by: Keith Busch Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal It seems that this one could go in regardless of this series (so I do not think it needs to be RFC). -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research