* [PATCH] Fix Revert "bfq: Fix computation of shallow depth" in linux-block.git
@ 2021-02-03 3:31 Lin Feng
2021-02-03 3:37 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lin Feng @ 2021-02-03 3:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: axboe; +Cc: linux-block, linf
Hi Jens,
Not yet got your mail, but per https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/2/2/1901, this patch
is the incremental. Codes based on:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/patch/?id=8a483b42b1b3cef7e72564cdcdde62a373bd2f01
Notes: After checking previous hand-applied patch in block-5.11 broken 2 lines
in original patch, the incremental covers all.
Thanks.
Signed-off-by: Lin Feng <linf@wangsu.com>
---
block/bfq-iosched.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 959e25c..9e81d10 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -6332,13 +6332,13 @@ static unsigned int bfq_update_depths(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
* limit 'something'.
*/
/* no more than 50% of tags for async I/O */
- bfqd->word_depths[0][1] = max(((1U << bt->sb.shift) * 3) >> 2, 1U);
+ bfqd->word_depths[0][0] = max((1U << bt->sb.shift) >> 1, 1U);
/*
* no more than 75% of tags for sync writes (25% extra tags
* w.r.t. async I/O, to prevent async I/O from starving sync
* writes)
*/
- bfqd->word_depths[0][1] = max((bt->sb.depth * 3) >> 2, 1U);
+ bfqd->word_depths[0][1] = max(((1U << bt->sb.shift) * 3) >> 2, 1U);
/*
* In-word depths in case some bfq_queue is being weight-
--
2.25.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix Revert "bfq: Fix computation of shallow depth" in linux-block.git
2021-02-03 3:31 [PATCH] Fix Revert "bfq: Fix computation of shallow depth" in linux-block.git Lin Feng
@ 2021-02-03 3:37 ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-03 3:54 ` Lin Feng
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2021-02-03 3:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lin Feng; +Cc: linux-block
On 2/2/21 8:31 PM, Lin Feng wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> Not yet got your mail, but per https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/2/2/1901, this patch
> is the incremental. Codes based on:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/patch/?id=8a483b42b1b3cef7e72564cdcdde62a373bd2f01
>
> Notes: After checking previous hand-applied patch in block-5.11 broken 2 lines
> in original patch, the incremental covers all.
Thanks, folded in. Please check the resulting patch:
https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=block-5.11&id=388c705b95f23f317fa43e6abf9ff07b583b721a
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix Revert "bfq: Fix computation of shallow depth" in linux-block.git
2021-02-03 3:37 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2021-02-03 3:54 ` Lin Feng
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lin Feng @ 2021-02-03 3:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: linux-block
On 2/3/21 11:37, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/2/21 8:31 PM, Lin Feng wrote:
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> Not yet got your mail, but per https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/2/2/1901, this patch
>> is the incremental. Codes based on:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/patch/?id=8a483b42b1b3cef7e72564cdcdde62a373bd2f01
>>
>> Notes: After checking previous hand-applied patch in block-5.11 broken 2 lines
>> in original patch, the incremental covers all.
>
> Thanks, folded in. Please check the resulting patch:
>
> https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=block-5.11&id=388c705b95f23f317fa43e6abf9ff07b583b721a
>
Yes, it's correct :)
Thanks,
linfeng
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-03 3:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-03 3:31 [PATCH] Fix Revert "bfq: Fix computation of shallow depth" in linux-block.git Lin Feng
2021-02-03 3:37 ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-03 3:54 ` Lin Feng
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox