From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>,
Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: v5.14 RXE driver broken?
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 13:58:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bac1d404-ae2b-c6cc-a065-de2dab25bea9@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <423ed740-96e7-aebb-3e6f-7416108f5a62@acm.org>
On 8/25/21 11:22 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 8/25/21 9:32 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 11:02:14AM +0800, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 11:02 AM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Bob,
>>>>
>>>> If I run the following test against Linus' master branch then that test
>>>> passes (commit d5ae8d7f85b7 ("Revert "media: dvb header files: move some
>>>> headers to staging"")):
>>>>
>>>> # export use_siw=1 && modprobe brd && (cd blktests && ./check -q srp/002)
>>>> srp/002 (File I/O on top of multipath concurrently with logout and login (mq)) [passed]
>>>> runtime ... 48.849s
>>>>
>>>> The following test fails:
>>>>
>>>> # export use_siw= && modprobe brd && (cd blktests && ./check -q srp/002)
>>>> srp/002 (File I/O on top of multipath concurrently with logout and login (mq)) [failed]
>>>> runtime 48.849s ... 15.024s
>>>> +++ /home/bart/software/blktests/results/nodev/srp/002.out.bad 2021-08-23 19:51:05.182958728 -0700
>>>> @@ -1,2 +1 @@
>>>> Configured SRP target driver
>>>> -Passed
>>>
>>> Can this commit "RDMA/rxe: Zero out index member of struct rxe_queue"
>>> in the link https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git/commit/?h=wip/jgg-for-rc
>>> fix this problem?
>>>
>>> And the commit will be merged into linux upstream very soon.
>>
>> Please let me know Bart, if the rxe driver is still broken I will
>> definitely punt all the changes for RXE to the next cycle until it can
>> be fixed.
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> Thanks for having offered to revert the RXE changes from this merge window.
> Unfortunately that wouldn't be sufficient. My test results so far for test
> srp/002 in combination with the rdma_rxe driver are as follows:
> * Kernel v5.12: test passes.
> * Kernel v5.13: test fails.
> * Kernel v5.14-rc7: test fails.
>
> For the rdma_rxe tests for kernel v5.14-rc7 I found the following in the kernel
> log:
>
> ib_srp:add_target_store: ib_srp: max_sectors = 1024; max_pages_per_mr = 512; mr_page_size = 4096; max_sectors_per_mr = 4096; mr_per_cmd = 2
> ib_srp: enp1s0_rxe: ib_alloc_mr() failed. Try to reduce max_cmd_per_lun, max_sect or ch_count
>
> There is sufficient memory available in the VM in which I ran the tests. It is
> not clear to me why ib_alloc_mr() fails with these parameters when using the
> rdma_rxe driver? As one can see in srp_alloc_fr_pool() the SRP initiator driver
> respects the max_pages_per_mr RDMA driver limit.
A correction: test srp/002 passes on my setup against kernel v5.13. I probably
selected the wrong kernel from the GRUB boot menu before I sent my previous email.
So the test failure is something that happens with v5.14-rc but not with v5.13.
Applying the following patch on top Linus' master branch did not help:
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h
index 742e6ec93686..643b80e47c82 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ enum rxe_device_param {
RXE_MIN_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00020001,
RXE_MAX_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00040000,
- RXE_MAX_MR = 0x00001000,
+ RXE_MAX_MR = 0x00100000,
RXE_MAX_MW = 0x00001000,
RXE_MIN_MR_INDEX = 0x00000001,
RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00010000,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-25 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-24 3:01 v5.14 RXE driver broken? Bart Van Assche
2021-08-25 3:02 ` Zhu Yanjun
2021-08-25 16:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-25 18:03 ` Bob Pearson
2021-08-25 18:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-08-25 20:58 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-08-25 21:09 ` Bob Pearson
2021-08-25 21:44 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-08-26 19:03 ` Bob Pearson
2021-08-26 20:03 ` Bob Pearson
2021-08-27 3:18 ` Zhu Yanjun
2021-08-25 16:46 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bac1d404-ae2b-c6cc-a065-de2dab25bea9@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox