public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <ckulkarnilinux@gmail.com>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>, "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] loop: respect REQ_NOWAIT for memory allocation
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 01:52:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb2d2b08-7a90-443b-bd3c-cd86212a03d0@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb672149-fb81-489e-8afb-8ffdd8eb7702@kernel.org>

On 11/15/25 22:26, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 11/16/25 14:43, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
>> On 11/15/25 19:50, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>> On 11/16/25 11:52, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
>>>>     6. Loop driver:
>>>>      loop_queue_rq()
>>>>       lo_rw_aio()
>>>>        kmalloc_array(..., GFP_NOIO) <-- BLOCKS (REQ_NOWAIT violation)
>>>>         -> Should use GFP_NOWAIT when rq->cmd_flags & REQ_NOWAIT
>>> Same comment as for zloop. Re-read the code and see that loop_queue_rq() calls
>>> loop_queue_work(). That function has a memory allocation that is already marked
>>> with GFP_NOWAIT, and that this function does not directly execute lo_rw_aio() as
>>> that is done from loop_workfn(), in the work item context.
>>> So again, no blocking violation that I can see here.
>>> As far as I can tell, this patch is not needed.
>>>
>> Thanks for pointing that out. Since REQ_NOWAIT is not valid in the
>> workqueue, then REQ_NOWAIT flag needs to be cleared before
>> handing it over to workqueue ? is that the right interpretation?
> No. the queue_rq context does not block, so REQ_NOWAIT is being respected. I do
> not see any issue with it. REQ_NOWAIT simply means that ->queue_rq() should not
> block. It does not mean that the IO should/will be completed instantaneously...
>
> Did you by any chance trigger a warning or something ? If yes, waht is the
> reproducer ?

sorry for the late reply, yes I'm remotely debugging the loop device on
a physical machine, don't have any access to get the trace or reproducer.
While examining the request flags I encountered this, where req is still
marked REQ_NOWAIT and it's not honored.

-ck



  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-18  1:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-16  2:52 [PATCH 1/2] loop: respect REQ_NOWAIT for memory allocation Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-16  2:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] zloop: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-16  3:44   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-11-16  3:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] loop: " Damien Le Moal
2025-11-16  5:43   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-16  6:26     ` Damien Le Moal
2025-11-18  1:52       ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2025-11-18  5:21     ` hch
2025-11-18 13:57       ` Jens Axboe
2025-11-19  0:39         ` Chaitanya Kulkarni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bb2d2b08-7a90-443b-bd3c-cd86212a03d0@nvidia.com \
    --to=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=ckulkarnilinux@gmail.com \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox