From: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"dm-devel@lists.linux.dev" <dm-devel@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: sysfs integrity fields use
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 15:02:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc9d0c28-3712-4315-a582-9dbce9f9f05d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z73kDfIkgu4v-c9W@infradead.org>
Hi,
On 2/25/25 4:38 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
...
>
>> Then we have new (undocumented) value for NVMe in
>> - /sys/block/<nvme>/integrity/metadata_bytes
>> This contains the correct 64.
>
> Yes, this contains the full size of the metadata. And besides
> documenting it we should probably also lift it to the block layer.
yes, this is exactly what I need, just it should be present
for all block devices.
>> Anyway, when I try to use it (for authentication tags in dm-crypt), it works.
>>
>> Should tag_size and device_is_integrity_capable be set even for the "nop" format?
>> Is it a bug or a feature? :-)
>
> It is expected. The only issue is that the block support for metadata
> is called integrity all over because it was initially added for PI only
> and then extended for non-PI metadata, which makes things a little
> confusing.
ok, that make sense. Maybe the note should be added to sysfs doc too.
Thanks,
Milan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-26 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250225092525epcas5p31dd0a19ffdfb39f3f2ce4acd1c6da7ee@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2025-02-25 9:23 ` sysfs integrity fields use Milan Broz
2025-02-25 10:10 ` Kanchan Joshi
2025-02-25 10:44 ` Kanchan Joshi
2025-02-25 11:03 ` Milan Broz
2025-02-26 10:04 ` Kanchan Joshi
2025-02-25 15:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 14:02 ` Milan Broz [this message]
2025-02-27 14:46 ` [PATCH] docs: sysfs-block: Clarify integrity sysfs attributes for non-PI metadata Milan Broz
2025-03-03 17:25 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-03-03 18:52 ` Milan Broz
2025-03-06 2:28 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-03-18 15:44 ` [PATCH] docs: sysfs-block: Clarify integrity sysfs attributes Milan Broz
2025-03-20 7:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-20 11:44 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bc9d0c28-3712-4315-a582-9dbce9f9f05d@gmail.com \
--to=gmazyland@gmail.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox