Re: [LSF/MM/BPF BoF] BoF for Zoned Storage

Adam Manzanares
2022-03-03T05:22:05Z

On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 04:31:58AM +0000, Matias Bjørling wrote:
> Good idea to bring up zoned storage topics. I'd like to participate as well.
>
> Best, Matias

I'm also working on zoned storage ATM so count me in as well.

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> Sent: Thursday, 3 March 2022 02.33
> To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>; linux-block@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org
> Cc: Matias Bjørling <Matias.Bjorling@wdc.com>; Javier González <javier.gonz@samsung.com>; Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>; Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@samsung.com>; Keith Busch <Keith.Busch@wdc.com>; Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>; Naohiro Aota <Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com>; Pankaj Raghav <pankydev8@gmail.com>; Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>; Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@samsung.com>
> Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF BoF] BoF for Zoned Storage
>
> On 3/2/22 16:56, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > Thinking proactively about LSFMM, regarding just Zone storage..
> >
> > I'd like to propose a BoF for Zoned Storage. The point of it is to
> > address the existing point points we have and take advantage of having
> > folks in the room we can likely settle on things faster which
> > otherwise would take years.
> >
> > I'll throw at least one topic out:
> >
> > * Raw access for zone append for microbenchmarks:
> > - are we really happy with the status quo?
> > - if not what outlets do we have?
> >
> > I think the nvme passthrogh stuff deserves it's own shared discussion
> > though and should not make it part of the BoF.
>
> Since I'm working on zoned storage I'd like to participate.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.