From: Ziyang Zhang <ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: use of the system work queue in ublk
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 16:55:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bcd9ac30-9961-5607-e40d-41915af5cd88@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YtUNX2l2xkWXQwYA@T590>
On 2022/7/18 15:35, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 11:38:25PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Hi Ming,
>>
>> it seems like ublk uses schedule_work to stop the device, which
>> includes a del_gendisk. I'm a little fearful this will gets us into
>> lockdep chains of death once syzbot or Tetsu notice it.
>
> ublksrv has two built-in tests(generic/001, generic/002) for covering
> heavy io with device removal and killing ubq_daemon, not see lockdep
> warning when running the two tests with lockdep enabled.
>
> Could you or Tetsu provide a bit more info about the warning?
>
>>
>> That being said, I don't reall understand the design of
>> ublk_daemon_monitor_work, which is only used to kick off other
>> work to start with.
>
> If the ubq daemon becomes dead, ublk_daemon_monitor_work will be
> scheduled for handling the error: abort pending io requests, and
> start to delete disk.
>
> It has to be triggered when del_gendisk() is in-progress for making
> forward progress.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ming
Hi Ming,
Just to make sure I understand usage of ublk_daemon_monitor_work correctly.
1) For a dying ubq daemon, ublk_daemon_monitor_work schedule stop work first.
2) The stop work calls del_gendisk() and it is blocked because there are
pending blk-mq requests(maybe handling in ublksrv target).
3) Meanwhile, the monitor work aborts all pending blk-mq IOs
(with UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE unset) by blk_mq_end_request(req, BLK_STS_IOERR).
4) After all pending blk-mq reqs are aborted,
del_gendisk() in stop work returns and /dev/ublkbX is removed.
No more blk-mq reqs.
5) In stop work, cancel all queued(with UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE set) ublk IOs
by io_uring_cmd_done(io->cmd, UBLK_IO_RES_ABORT, 0) and ublksrv won't
issue sqes again.
Hope I am correct and all of these works looks good to me.
Besides, the tests(generic/001, generic/002) run successfully for me.
Regards,
Ziyang Zhang
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-18 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-18 6:38 use of the system work queue in ublk Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-18 7:35 ` Ming Lei
2022-07-18 8:55 ` Ziyang Zhang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bcd9ac30-9961-5607-e40d-41915af5cd88@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=ziyangzhang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox