Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
	tytso@mit.edu, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, ebiggers@kernel.org,
	jaegeuk@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de,
	djwong@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
	berto@igalia.com, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz,
	yi.zhang@huawei.com, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
	ritesh.list@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] blk-crypto: reject fallback data unit sizes it can't handle
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 15:50:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bda10a43-5ff3-4f8d-b9a7-e63161e0fb4b@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sashiko-outbox-167341@kernel.org>

On 2026/10/12 01:20, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] block: NULL pointer deref in blk_crypto_fallback_evict_key() on setup failure
[...]
> [Severity: High]
> Does this early return bypass blk_crypto_fallback_init() and leave
> blk_crypto_fallback_profile as NULL?
>
> If this is the first fallback usage, returning here means we haven't
> initialized the profile. If downstream callers (like dm-inlinecrypt) handle
> this -EOPNOTSUPP error by attempting to evict the partially initialized key,
> can it lead to a NULL pointer dereference?
>
> When target teardown calls blk_crypto_evict_key(), it will eventually call
> blk_crypto_fallback_evict_key(), which passes the uninitialized profile
> directly:
>
> block/blk-crypto-fallback.c:blk_crypto_fallback_evict_key() {
> 	return __blk_crypto_evict_key(blk_crypto_fallback_profile, key);
> }
>
> This unvalidated profile pointer is then dereferenced when checking the number
> of slots:
>
> block/blk-crypto-profile.c:__blk_crypto_evict_key() {
> 	...
> 	if (profile->num_slots == 0) {
> 	...
> }
>
> Could this cause a kernel panic if a user with device mapper access requests
> an unsupported data unit size?
>

The early return does leave blk_crypto_fallback_profile uninitialized,
but the NULL dereference that follows is a pre-existing issue, unrelated
to this series: the same eviction path is reachable on the base tree,
and the two flows below trigger a NULL dereference or a use-after-free:

  dm-inlinecrypt ctor            # first use of the fallback
   ├─ blk_crypto_init_key()      # succeeds, ctx->key.size != 0
   ├─ blk_crypto_start_using_key()
   │   ├─ return -EOPNOTSUPP     # uninit profile, will NULL deref
   │   └─ blk_crypto_fallback_start_using_key()
   │      └─ blk_crypto_fallback_init() fails
   │         └─ kfree(profile)   # not NULLed, will UAF
   ├─ goto bad
   └─ inlinecrypt_dtr()          # evicts whenever key.size is set
      └─ blk_crypto_evict_key()
         └─ blk_crypto_config_supported_natively() = false
            └─ blk_crypto_fallback_evict_key()
               └─ __blk_crypto_evict_key(blk_crypto_fallback_profile)
                  └─ profile->num_slots # BOOM!!!

If this series doesn't need a V2, I'll send the fix as a standalone
bugfix.  If a V2 is needed, I'll include it in the series before this
patch.


Thanks,
Baokun


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-12  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-11 17:09 [PATCH 00/13] block, ext4: allow encryption with a block size larger than the page size Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 01/13] ext4: refuse encryption when block size > " Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 02/13] ext4: reject encrypted inodes " Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 03/13] blk-crypto: reject fallback data unit sizes it can't handle Baokun Li
     [not found]   ` <sashiko-outbox-167341@kernel.org>
2026-10-12  7:50     ` Baokun Li [this message]
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 04/13] blk-crypto: decrypt one data unit per crypto request Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 05/13] blk-crypto: encrypt " Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 06/13] blk-crypto: support data units larger than a page Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 07/13] iomap: align the direct I/O bios of encrypted files to the block size Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 08/13] block: split encrypted bios at data unit boundaries Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 09/13] block: warn about bios that can't be split Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 10/13] block: don't require data unit aligned bio_vecs for encrypted bios Baokun Li
     [not found]   ` <sashiko-outbox-167346@kernel.org>
2026-10-12  8:09     ` Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 11/13] ext4: allow encryption with a block size larger than the page size Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 12/13] ext4: send folios that cover a wraparound to the buffer_head path Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 13/13] ext4: allow large folios for encrypted files Baokun Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bda10a43-5ff3-4f8d-b9a7-e63161e0fb4b@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=berto@igalia.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox