From: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
tytso@mit.edu, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, ebiggers@kernel.org,
jaegeuk@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de,
djwong@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
berto@igalia.com, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz,
yi.zhang@huawei.com, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] blk-crypto: reject fallback data unit sizes it can't handle
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 15:50:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bda10a43-5ff3-4f8d-b9a7-e63161e0fb4b@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sashiko-outbox-167341@kernel.org>
On 2026/10/12 01:20, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] block: NULL pointer deref in blk_crypto_fallback_evict_key() on setup failure
[...]
> [Severity: High]
> Does this early return bypass blk_crypto_fallback_init() and leave
> blk_crypto_fallback_profile as NULL?
>
> If this is the first fallback usage, returning here means we haven't
> initialized the profile. If downstream callers (like dm-inlinecrypt) handle
> this -EOPNOTSUPP error by attempting to evict the partially initialized key,
> can it lead to a NULL pointer dereference?
>
> When target teardown calls blk_crypto_evict_key(), it will eventually call
> blk_crypto_fallback_evict_key(), which passes the uninitialized profile
> directly:
>
> block/blk-crypto-fallback.c:blk_crypto_fallback_evict_key() {
> return __blk_crypto_evict_key(blk_crypto_fallback_profile, key);
> }
>
> This unvalidated profile pointer is then dereferenced when checking the number
> of slots:
>
> block/blk-crypto-profile.c:__blk_crypto_evict_key() {
> ...
> if (profile->num_slots == 0) {
> ...
> }
>
> Could this cause a kernel panic if a user with device mapper access requests
> an unsupported data unit size?
>
The early return does leave blk_crypto_fallback_profile uninitialized,
but the NULL dereference that follows is a pre-existing issue, unrelated
to this series: the same eviction path is reachable on the base tree,
and the two flows below trigger a NULL dereference or a use-after-free:
dm-inlinecrypt ctor # first use of the fallback
├─ blk_crypto_init_key() # succeeds, ctx->key.size != 0
├─ blk_crypto_start_using_key()
│ ├─ return -EOPNOTSUPP # uninit profile, will NULL deref
│ └─ blk_crypto_fallback_start_using_key()
│ └─ blk_crypto_fallback_init() fails
│ └─ kfree(profile) # not NULLed, will UAF
├─ goto bad
└─ inlinecrypt_dtr() # evicts whenever key.size is set
└─ blk_crypto_evict_key()
└─ blk_crypto_config_supported_natively() = false
└─ blk_crypto_fallback_evict_key()
└─ __blk_crypto_evict_key(blk_crypto_fallback_profile)
└─ profile->num_slots # BOOM!!!
If this series doesn't need a V2, I'll send the fix as a standalone
bugfix. If a V2 is needed, I'll include it in the series before this
patch.
Thanks,
Baokun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-11 17:09 [PATCH 00/13] block, ext4: allow encryption with a block size larger than the page size Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 01/13] ext4: refuse encryption when block size > " Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 02/13] ext4: reject encrypted inodes " Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 03/13] blk-crypto: reject fallback data unit sizes it can't handle Baokun Li
[not found] ` <sashiko-outbox-167341@kernel.org>
2026-10-12 7:50 ` Baokun Li [this message]
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 04/13] blk-crypto: decrypt one data unit per crypto request Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 05/13] blk-crypto: encrypt " Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 06/13] blk-crypto: support data units larger than a page Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 07/13] iomap: align the direct I/O bios of encrypted files to the block size Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 08/13] block: split encrypted bios at data unit boundaries Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 09/13] block: warn about bios that can't be split Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 10/13] block: don't require data unit aligned bio_vecs for encrypted bios Baokun Li
[not found] ` <sashiko-outbox-167346@kernel.org>
2026-10-12 8:09 ` Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 11/13] ext4: allow encryption with a block size larger than the page size Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 12/13] ext4: send folios that cover a wraparound to the buffer_head path Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 13/13] ext4: allow large folios for encrypted files Baokun Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bda10a43-5ff3-4f8d-b9a7-e63161e0fb4b@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=berto@igalia.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox