From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: for-4.12/block branch To: Bart Van Assche References: <1492788745.2550.1.camel@sandisk.com> <1492792278.2550.5.camel@sandisk.com> <1492792852.2550.7.camel@sandisk.com> <5e5870a4-bbff-8486-f28c-49127a9c60a5@fb.com> <1492794346.2550.12.camel@sandisk.com> <1492796361.2550.22.camel@sandisk.com> Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:53:44 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1492796361.2550.22.camel@sandisk.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 List-ID: On 04/21/2017 11:39 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 11:07 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> Let me know what that bisection yields. > > Hello Jens, > > Although I still have to double-check the result, this is what git bisect > reported: > > b00c53e8f411a0b2be036c41852c6858541afbf7 is the first bad commit > commit b00c53e8f411a0b2be036c41852c6858541afbf7 > Author: Jens Axboe > Date: Thu Apr 20 16:40:36 2017 -0600 > > blk-mq: fix schedule-while-atomic with scheduler attached > > I have attached my kernel config to this e-mail. Please let me know if you > need more information. That would have been my prime suspect as well, since it is fiddling with the preempt counts. I'll double check the patch. -- Jens Axboe