From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 004.mia.mailroute.net (004.mia.mailroute.net [199.89.3.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30770214236; Mon, 16 Jun 2025 16:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.7 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750090744; cv=none; b=qQsi59XtlPPuS/LoyuEnohw2bWr+na9c2pvoeW1BsRyBUI0SM8khthtna4KTKvga3e4s8g1NAl9TZcjc6Qhf6Gxoq6omhQZmtDRpIrzcPVWKe0Ek8wsL6TV5SFAvlCN7tz0uBZMdVo7e9PB5GKPccVVjstVH9asJDlqHspyOdmw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750090744; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vNhHW5dg6GReJadydX/LuZNflj5jbfPBFe7d5xyXAFU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=jh1AZ1rGuDnSBYWNLZmIzth7vvNHYG20lKX1gnGokZUImxnlm22WBP2muDnw7EMfNTMBe8wyuCZ8kuvGvoJsYOr/hTfil22ghxwNH+jLKW4lzEfNjd0iBCwst+4a9DQ/G9medBoT21efIuvaeY8LovD7OECG+JBFlF6PB9LMQmI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=PO7YVfUO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="PO7YVfUO" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 004.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bLZv36jrZzm0ySJ; Mon, 16 Jun 2025 16:18:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1750090733; x=1752682734; bh=6wC2gwimnc3l+Xw9+5+MBM67 AOIiYYbDZC+GpSzNsL4=; b=PO7YVfUOX9bC8pnhFFcoQfuKAx+vsYtSrRKjAyRm CFO/noAxj//F7emgHgnnroYkVSOtuPbPaB0vhQogugRzuNRimplcqBKiQhkTDxHq ni8I2P6NVl//blknGVCOXtLfou2bIlLvZqAuIFFhGisULhy1i2eCc6gta23TjhhG nv2DesA0exMNuq36jjsMfIbFnEb7SuZ1MerJMVctuLIgHBV7WoJujNLaiw0Bmo02 r7xD+710UOwEaO0lsGz1dG/6Jv1X32lNaatFrW/V1AdpG4DvPHp7UDRtdwKki+uQ WMFBweudA8bDijco6gedWp+TrZ/UnJxRGzFTq2x3a/D6dg== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 004.mia.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (004.mia [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id H3JDOKb3Nser; Mon, 16 Jun 2025 16:18:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.3.219] (c-73-231-117-72.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.117.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 004.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4bLZts2QLGzm0yTC; Mon, 16 Jun 2025 16:18:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 09:18:42 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: set max_segment_size as UINT_MAX explicitly To: Ming Lei , "Martin K . Petersen" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Wei Liu , Christoph Hellwig , "Ewan D. Milne" , Laurence Oberman References: <20250616160509.52491-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <20250616160509.52491-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/16/25 9:05 AM, Ming Lei wrote: > - storvrc uses virt_boundary to define `segment` ^^^^^^^ storvsc? > - strovrc does not define max_segment_size ^^^^^^^ storvsc? Otherwise this patch looks good to me. Thanks, Bart.