From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue
 spinlock
To: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
References: <20170306200319.GF19696@htj.duckdns.org>
 <20170309080531.9048-1-tahsin@google.com>
 <bb97baf4-b08a-b909-1bff-7c933b95be4e@kernel.dk>
 <e7d7aaab-3a32-61f6-44dd-3680d7f0c8db@kernel.dk>
 <CAAeU0aN6615BUP+ikqZeTm1=BSEN48uDu3Ucz8o9QrmETnkHSA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
 David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Message-ID: <c514c076-18ea-8605-d439-e46730aa29e0@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 08:32:56 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAeU0aN6615BUP+ikqZeTm1=BSEN48uDu3Ucz8o9QrmETnkHSA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
List-ID: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>

On 03/11/2017 09:35 PM, Tahsin Erdogan wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> 
>>
>> Talked to Tejun about this as well, and we both agree that the splitting
>> this into separate init/alloc paths would be much cleaner. I can't
>> apply the current patch, sorry, it's just too ugly to live.
> 
> Do you mean, you prefer the approach that was taken in v1 patch or
> something else?

I can no longer find v1 of the patch, just v2 and on. Can you send a
link to it?

-- 
Jens Axboe