linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>, osandov@fb.com
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blktests: replace module removal with patient module removal
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 21:01:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c584cf40-2181-2617-92aa-bcdbc56a5ab8@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YlogluONIoc1VTCI@bombadil.infradead.org>

On 4/15/22 18:49, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> -	if ! modprobe -r null_blk || ! modprobe null_blk "$@" "${zoned}" ; then
> -		return 1
> -	fi
> +	_patient_rmmod null_blk || return 1
> +	modprobe null_blk "$@" "${zoned}" || 1

"1" is not a valid command. Should "|| 1" perhaps be changed into "|| 
return 1"?

> +_has_modprobe_patient()
> +{
> +	modprobe --help >& /dev/null || return 1
> +	modprobe --help | grep -q -1 "remove-patiently" || return 1
> +	return 0
> +}

I can't find the meaning of "-1" in the grep man page. Did I perhaps 
overlook something?

> +# checks the refcount and returns 0 if we can safely remove the module. rmmod
> +# does this check for us, but we can use this to also iterate checking for this
> +# refcount before we even try to remove the module. This is useful when using
> +# debug test modules which take a while to quiesce.
> +_patient_rmmod_check_refcnt()
> +{
> +	local module=$1
> +	local refcnt=0
> +
> +	if [[ -f "/sys/module/$module/refcnt" ]]; then
> +		refcnt=$(cat "/sys/module/$module/refcnt" 2>/dev/null)
> +		if [[ $? -ne 0 || $refcnt -eq 0 ]]; then
> +			return 0
> +		fi
> +		return 1
> +	fi
> +	return 0
> +}

Hmm ... why is the check for existence of the refcnt separate from 
reading the refcnt? I think that just reading the refcnt should be 
sufficient. Additionally, that will avoid the race where the module is 
unloaded after the check and before the refcnt is read.

> -	modprobe -r nvme-"${nvme_trtype}" 2>/dev/null
> -	if [[ "${nvme_trtype}" != "loop" ]]; then
> -		modprobe -r nvmet-"${nvme_trtype}" 2>/dev/null
> -	fi
> -	modprobe -r nvmet 2>/dev/null
> +	if [[ "${nvme_trtype}" == "loop" ]]; then
> +		_patient_rmmod nvme_"${nvme_trtype}"
> +        else
> +                _patient_rmmod nvme-"${nvme_trtype}"
> +                _patient_rmmod nvmet-"${nvme_trtype}"
> +        fi
> +	_patient_rmmod nvmet 2>/dev/null

The statement _patient_rmmod nvme-"${nvme_trtype}" occurs twice in the 
above code. How about preserving the structure of the existing code such 
that that statement only occurs once?

>   # Unload the SRP initiator driver.
>   stop_srp_ini() {
> -	local i
> -
>   	log_out
> -	for ((i=40;i>=0;i--)); do
> -		remove_mpath_devs || return $?
> -		unload_module ib_srp >/dev/null 2>&1 && break
> -		sleep 1
> -	done
> -	if [ -e /sys/module/ib_srp ]; then
> -		echo "Error: unloading kernel module ib_srp failed"
> -		return 1
> -	fi
> -	unload_module scsi_transport_srp || return $?
> +	remove_mpath_devs || return $?
> +	_patient_rmmod ib_srp || return 1
> +	_patient_rmmod scsi_transport_srp || return $?
>   }

Removing the loop from around remove_mpath_devs is wrong. It is 
important that that loop is preserved.

Thanks,

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-16  4:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-16  1:49 [PATCH v2] blktests: replace module removal with patient module removal Luis Chamberlain
2022-04-16  4:01 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2022-04-18 15:57   ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-04-18 16:39     ` Bart Van Assche
2022-05-11 17:44       ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-05-11 18:22         ` Bart Van Assche
2022-12-20 21:28           ` Luis Chamberlain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c584cf40-2181-2617-92aa-bcdbc56a5ab8@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).