From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] nvme: reject invalid pr_read_keys() num_keys values
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 08:02:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c678bfcb-4872-4f3f-8aeb-3956c2e7a1c8@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251126163600.583036-3-stefanha@redhat.com>
On 11/26/25 17:35, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> The pr_read_keys() interface has a u32 num_keys parameter. The NVMe
> Reservation Report command has a u32 maximum length. Reject num_keys
> values that are too large to fit.
>
> This will become important when pr_read_keys() is exposed to untrusted
> userspace via an <linux/pr.h> ioctl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/pr.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pr.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pr.c
> index ca6a74607b139..476a0518a11ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pr.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pr.c
> @@ -233,6 +233,11 @@ static int nvme_pr_read_keys(struct block_device *bdev,
> int ret, i;
> bool eds;
>
> + /* Check that keys fit into u32 rse_len */
> + if (num_keys > -(u32)offsetof(typeof(*rse), regctl_eds) /
> + sizeof(rse->regctl_eds[0]))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> /*
> * Assume we are using 128-bit host IDs and allocate a buffer large
> * enough to get enough keys to fill the return keys buffer.
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-27 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-26 16:35 [PATCH 0/4] block: add IOC_PR_READ_KEYS and IOC_PR_READ_RESERVATION ioctls Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-11-26 16:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] scsi: sd: reject invalid pr_read_keys() num_keys values Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-11-27 6:59 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-11-26 16:35 ` [PATCH 2/4] nvme: " Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-11-27 7:02 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2025-11-26 16:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] block: add IOC_PR_READ_KEYS ioctl Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-11-26 18:06 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-27 7:07 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-11-29 14:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-12-01 15:06 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-12-01 16:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-12-01 18:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-12-01 15:14 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-12-01 16:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-11-29 14:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-11-26 16:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] block: add IOC_PR_READ_RESERVATION ioctl Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-11-27 7:07 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c678bfcb-4872-4f3f-8aeb-3956c2e7a1c8@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox