From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "Christoph Böhmwalder" <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>,
drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Lars Ellenberg" <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>,
"Philipp Reisner" <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] DRBD 9 rework
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 06:58:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c92d5318-8c8e-434f-835e-61cf1fae4edf@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adXk_m3SbRcWTOIC@infradead.org>
On 4/7/26 11:17 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 07:30:35PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 3/27/26 4:38 PM, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote:
>>> As discussed (context: [0]), here is the first version of our DRBD 9
>>> rework series, intended for for-next via for-7.1/drbd.
>>
>> Will you fixup the kerneldoc (nits) and the assigned-but-not-read
>> issues and send out a new version? Also looks this series doesn't
>> actually apply to for-7.1/block, patch 12 fails.
>
> Looks like all this went in without any review? Since when have we
> started these grand replacements anyway, as they are known to cause
> bugs and regressions?
See the previous discussion, the goal is to sync the two drbd code
bases. It's followed the "usual" pattern of the in-kernel driver being
neglected and development and users pushed to the out-of-tree one,
which is highly annoying.
As per the previous thread, the intent is not to push to to mainline
right now, but rather give it -next exposure without running into
conflicts between the trees. for-7.x/drbd will be rebased as needed,
and it's only in for-next for the stated reason.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-08 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-27 22:38 [PATCH 00/20] DRBD 9 rework Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-27 22:38 ` [PATCH 01/20] drbd: mark as BROKEN during " Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-27 22:38 ` [PATCH 02/20] drbd: extend wire protocol definitions for DRBD 9 Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-28 14:13 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-27 22:38 ` [PATCH 03/20] drbd: introduce DRBD 9 on-disk metadata format Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-27 22:38 ` [PATCH 04/20] drbd: add transport layer abstraction Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-27 22:38 ` [PATCH 05/20] drbd: add TCP transport implementation Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-27 22:38 ` [PATCH 06/20] drbd: add RDMA " Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-04-08 5:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-08 12:01 ` Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-27 22:38 ` [PATCH 07/20] drbd: add load-balancing TCP transport Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-27 22:38 ` [PATCH 08/20] drbd: add DAX/PMEM support for metadata access Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-04-08 5:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-27 22:38 ` [PATCH 09/20] drbd: add optional compatibility layer for DRBD 8.4 Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-27 22:38 ` [PATCH 10/20] drbd: rename drbd_worker.c to drbd_sender.c Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-27 22:38 ` [PATCH 11/20] drbd: rework sender for DRBD 9 multi-peer Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-27 22:38 ` [PATCH 12/20] drbd: replace per-device state model with multi-peer data structures Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-27 22:38 ` [PATCH 13/20] drbd: rewrite state machine for DRBD 9 multi-peer clusters Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-27 22:38 ` [PATCH 14/20] drbd: rework activity log and bitmap for multi-peer replication Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-27 22:38 ` [PATCH 15/20] drbd: rework request processing for DRBD 9 multi-peer IO Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-27 22:38 ` [PATCH 16/20] drbd: rework module core for DRBD 9 transport and multi-peer Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-27 22:38 ` [PATCH 17/20] drbd: rework receiver for DRBD 9 transport and multi-peer protocol Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-27 22:38 ` [PATCH 18/20] drbd: rework netlink management interface for DRBD 9 Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-27 22:38 ` [PATCH 19/20] drbd: update monitoring interfaces for multi-peer topology Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-27 22:38 ` [PATCH 20/20] drbd: remove BROKEN for DRBD Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-03-28 12:21 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-28 14:20 ` kernel test robot
2026-04-03 1:30 ` [PATCH 00/20] DRBD 9 rework Jens Axboe
2026-04-03 13:24 ` Christoph Böhmwalder
2026-04-03 13:26 ` Jens Axboe
2026-04-08 5:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-08 12:58 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2026-04-09 6:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c92d5318-8c8e-434f-835e-61cf1fae4edf@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox