Re: make block layer auto-PI deadlock safe v3

[Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>]

On 11/5/25 12:46 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 08:03:57AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> This is 6.19 material.  That's just a heads up that you need a merge
>>> (or rebase which I was hoping for as of the first round, but it's probably
>>> too late now)
>>
>> But why not generate it against the 6.19 tree then? As-is, I have to
>> first resolve the conflict in that tree, then resolve it again when
>> merging to for-next. Not a huge issue, just don't quite follow the logic
>> behind generating it against block-6.18.
> 
> Mostly because I though you'd rebase when I did the first version and
> then didn't really think about the base more after that.

Gotcha, yeah would've perhaps made sense back then, but way too late at
this point.

> Btw, we'll need the merge anyway for Keith's unaligned PI patch if we
> end up adding that for 6.19.

Yep did notice that. But since we already have a conflict, not big deal.

-- 
Jens Axboe