From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: hch@lst.de, ming.lei@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
sth@linux.ibm.com, gjoyce@ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 2/3] block: fix lockdep warning caused by lock dependency in elv_iosched_store
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 12:52:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <caf4e390-a9e2-4ad5-8bb6-ca6b59053b84@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250701081954.57381-3-nilay@linux.ibm.com>
On 7/1/25 10:18, Nilay Shroff wrote:
> Recent lockdep reports [1] have revealed a potential deadlock caused by a
> lock dependency between the percpu allocator lock and the elevator lock.
> This issue can be avoided by ensuring that the allocation and release of
> scheduler tags (sched_tags) are performed outside the elevator lock.
> Furthermore, the queue does not need to be remain frozen during these
> operations.
>
> To address this, move all sched_tags allocations and deallocations outside
> of both the ->elevator_lock and the ->freeze_lock. Since the lifetime of
> the elevator queue and its associated sched_tags is closely tied, the
> allocated sched_tags are now stored in the elevator queue structure. Then,
> during the actual elevator switch (which runs under ->freeze_lock and
> ->elevator_lock), the pre-allocated sched_tags are assigned to the
> appropriate q->hctx. Once the elevator switch is complete and the locks
> are released, the old elevator queue and its associated sched_tags are
> freed.
>
> This commit specifically addresses the allocation/deallocation of sched_
> tags during elevator switching. Note that sched_tags may also be allocated
> in other contexts, such as during nr_hw_queues updates. Supporting that
> use case will require batch allocation/deallocation, which will be handled
> in a follow-up patch.
>
> This restructuring ensures that sched_tags memory management occurs
> entirely outside of the ->elevator_lock and ->freeze_lock context,
> eliminating the lock dependency problem seen during scheduler updates.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/0659ea8d-a463-47c8-9180-43c719e106eb@linux.ibm.com/
>
> Reported-by: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0659ea8d-a463-47c8-9180-43c719e106eb@linux.ibm.com/
> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq-sched.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> block/blk-mq-sched.h | 8 ++-
> block/elevator.c | 47 +++++++++++--
> block/elevator.h | 14 +++-
> 4 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-01 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-01 8:18 [PATCHv7 0/3] block: move sched_tags allocation/de-allocation outside of locking context Nilay Shroff
2025-07-01 8:18 ` [PATCHv7 1/3] block: move elevator queue allocation logic into blk_mq_init_sched Nilay Shroff
2025-07-01 8:18 ` [PATCHv7 2/3] block: fix lockdep warning caused by lock dependency in elv_iosched_store Nilay Shroff
2025-07-01 10:52 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2025-07-01 8:19 ` [PATCHv7 3/3] block: fix potential deadlock while running nr_hw_queue update Nilay Shroff
2025-07-01 11:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-02 13:53 ` [PATCHv7 0/3] block: move sched_tags allocation/de-allocation outside of locking context Yi Zhang
2025-07-02 14:17 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-07-02 14:41 ` Yi Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=caf4e390-a9e2-4ad5-8bb6-ca6b59053b84@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gjoyce@ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sth@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox