From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-co1nam03on0059.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.40.59]:15592 "EHLO NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753083AbcKBTfs (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:35:48 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/14] Fix race conditions related to stopping block layer queues To: Jens Axboe References: <7460e8b2-2cfd-c0d5-7ae7-7f662d89dad3@sandisk.com> CC: Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , "Martin K. Petersen" , Mike Snitzer , Doug Ledford , Keith Busch , Ming Lei , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=c3=a9?= , Laurence Oberman , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" From: Bart Van Assche Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:35:40 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On 11/02/2016 01:08 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > Bart, I have applied the series, except patches 11+12. I don't mind > taking them through the block tree, but they can go through the SCSI > tree as well. Let me know what folks think. Hello Jens, Thanks for having applied this patch series. I will resend the SCSI patches to the SCSI maintainers. Since I am not aware of any bug report for which these patches are the proper fix I don't think there is any urgency to apply the SCSI patches. Bart.