From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2A1C5B57A for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 16:35:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27359216FD for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 16:35:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="nJ6hEyg3" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726849AbfF2Qff (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jun 2019 12:35:35 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f67.google.com ([209.85.166.67]:43087 "EHLO mail-io1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726837AbfF2Qfd (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jun 2019 12:35:33 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f67.google.com with SMTP id k20so19165977ios.10 for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 09:35:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0bLcPXD293myVNKmMw/+HXfUyYNiVcqiviMrBWHy3K0=; b=nJ6hEyg3jX+4MXvvPdz75vPCWZ2LYuqhZlzSd2zW1dmPKZqnhrUgLqvgF/PsHutTn1 FcygzfAPw9KHygKpqg4jYfhQLrZXU98FkC8Vdc1iz30YuoCBql104JBsQPdRWOuDAhjg IPaxQAFpuJgK+qNSYBvTQPh4rt8wZAdh/7AR/3PWzoJXQhrlkByBcivaW7AAfA8XIwOQ vnO4SQaeJ16m3ncYWHqkK4mOqvDBwBVQfcERw+KuEThU972nXv02cPJur8AebwXmLhMQ tGdJc5vwfxoV/88tzdDVu7b1hUdZ2iz5PSCoBNrzeDWr/f4yx4oa1Y13bKmuXaFFHK6O C/DQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0bLcPXD293myVNKmMw/+HXfUyYNiVcqiviMrBWHy3K0=; b=R07hfzSDsMoXlxuMxP1lMm2uNtIXDNHubKM51ykNGs0upFyrSMxZwvZ4jlITjFi0MC NzjRWyKxK+J1FjOZeY0BECjj4r7rMzMgyzrGqqIyIqninr5NYMzQXQL5WLJTtuGI0uUD Ism/EoFid6FSbDdFjxublegmkO5WOAkT0YvLdJX2m3X87aWS9g/+kBDqJuEWpmra6BP9 LnwG2Yfcabr9XWMLPoSqldwnuGe+jOjV9gU13FjVBa+QVcQTM3hT829LhbXfqXmHz1qo YIIe3VbultBEyh2PJ/sFHK2VbNNF7H85wc4uuE9rTywWfMcpH1dJIqmJ4sCYVciNI7e4 i/0A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWTn8/A47QFmzU4P0WqAYuH37jzGvPJwcYi/kpeMDy1XaZ46KhA idaouuo9AboPgDGXM815HH9s2w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy2wRKtN2cvMlA/F9Z2nWcwqtokFG7YSVfK/YCihAPLXVBzuTMTb6+TFylxQ7+N2cD40p3C3Q== X-Received: by 2002:a02:a48f:: with SMTP id d15mr18068186jam.12.1561826132648; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 09:35:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.158] ([65.144.74.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r24sm4260675ioc.76.2019.06.29.09.35.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 29 Jun 2019 09:35:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] block: sed-opal: add support for shadow MBR done flag and write To: Scott Bauer Cc: jonathan.derrick@intel.com, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "jonas.rabenstein@studium.uni-erlangen.de" References: <1558471606-25139-1-git-send-email-zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz> <7ee5d705c12d770bf7566bce7d664bf733b25206.camel@intel.com> <20190629161947.GA20127@hacktheplanet> <20190629162835.GA21042@hacktheplanet> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:35:30 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190629162835.GA21042@hacktheplanet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On 6/29/19 10:28 AM, Scott Bauer wrote: > On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 10:26:52AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 6/29/19 10:19 AM, Scott Bauer wrote: >>> >>> Hey Jens, >>> >>> Can you please stage these for 5.3 aswell? >> >> Yes, looks fine to me. But it conflicts with the psid revert in terms >> of ioctl numbering. You fine with me renumbering IOC_OPAL_MBR_DONE to: >> >> #define IOC_OPAL_MBR_DONE _IOW('p', 233, struct opal_mbr_done) > > Sorry for the conflict. That's fine. I'll fix up userland tooling. Renamed 232 -> 233, and 233 -> 234, for the two conflicts. So now we have: #define IOC_OPAL_PSID_REVERT_TPR _IOW('p', 232, struct opal_key) #define IOC_OPAL_MBR_DONE _IOW('p', 233, struct opal_mbr_done) #define IOC_OPAL_WRITE_SHADOW_MBR _IOW('p', 234, struct opal_shadow_mbr) -- Jens Axboe