public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block/mq-deadline: Speed up the dispatch of low-priority requests
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 10:14:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb651839-bc72-5b85-c531-af28b84dcbaf@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR04MB70817A17F89A5654A46F3729E7CB9@DM6PR04MB7081.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On 8/29/21 8:07 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2021/08/30 11:40, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 8/29/21 16:02, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>> On 2021/08/27 23:34, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>>> On 8/26/21 9:49 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>>>> So the mq-deadline priority patch reduces performance by nearly half at high QD.
>>>>> (*) Note: in all cases using the mq-deadline scheduler, for the first run at
>>>>> QD=1, I get this splat 100% of the time.
>>>>>
>>>>> [   95.173889] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 26s! [kworker/0:1H:757]
>>>>> [   95.292994] CPU: 0 PID: 757 Comm: kworker/0:1H Not tainted 5.14.0-rc7+ #1334
>>>>> [   95.307504] Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn
>>>>> [   95.312243] RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x40
>>>>> [   95.415904] Call Trace:
>>>>> [   95.418373]  try_to_wake_up+0x268/0x7c0
>>>>> [   95.422238]  blk_update_request+0x25b/0x420
>>>>> [   95.426452]  blk_mq_end_request+0x1c/0x120
>>>>> [   95.430576]  null_handle_cmd+0x12d/0x270 [null_blk]
>>>>> [   95.435485]  blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x13c/0x7f0
>>>>> [   95.443826]  __blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0xb5/0x2f0
>>>>> [   95.448653]  __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0xf4/0x140
>>>>> [   95.453998]  blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x30/0x60
>>>>> [   95.459083]  __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x49/0x90
>>>>> [   95.463377]  process_one_work+0x26c/0x570
>>>>> [   95.467421]  worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
>>>>> [   95.475313]  kthread+0x140/0x160
>>>>> [   95.482774]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>>>>
>>>> I don't see any function names in the above call stack that refer to the
>>>> mq-deadline scheduler? Did I perhaps overlook something? Anyway, if you can
>>>> tell me how to reproduce this (kernel commit + kernel config) I will take a
>>>> look.
>>>
>>> Indeed, the stack trace does not show any mq-deadline function. But the
>>> workqueue is stuck on _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore() in the blk_mq_run_work_fn()
>>> function. I suspect that the spinlock is dd->lock, so the CPU may be stuck on
>>> entry to mq-deadline dispatch or finish request methods. Not entirely sure.
>>>
>>> I got this splat with 5.4.0-rc7 (Linus tag patch) with the attached config.
>>
>> Hi Damien,
>>
>> Thank you for having shared the kernel configuration used in your test.
>> So far I have not yet been able to reproduce the above call trace in a
>> VM. Could the above call trace have been triggered by the mpt3sas driver
>> instead of the mq-deadline I/O scheduler?
> 
> The above was triggered using nullblk with the test script you sent. I was not
> using drives on the HBA or AHCI when it happens. And I can reproduce this 100%
> of the time by running your script with QD=1.

Hi Damien,

I rebuilt kernel v5.14-rc7 (tag v5.14-rc7) after having run git clean -f -d -x
and reran my nullb iops test with the mq-deadline scheduler. No kernel complaints
appeared in the kernel log. Next I enabled lockdep (CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y) and
reran the nullb iops test with mq-deadline as scheduler. Again zero complaints
appeared in the kernel log. Next I ran a subset of the blktests test
(./check -q block). All tests passed and no complaints appeared in the kernel log.

Please help with root-causing this issue by rerunning the test on your setup after
having enabled lockdep.

Thanks,

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-30 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-26 14:40 [PATCH] block/mq-deadline: Speed up the dispatch of low-priority requests Zhen Lei
2021-08-26 18:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-08-26 18:13   ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-26 18:45     ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-26 19:17       ` Bart Van Assche
2021-08-26 19:32         ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-26 23:49       ` Bart Van Assche
2021-08-26 23:51         ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-27  0:03           ` Bart Van Assche
2021-08-27  0:05             ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-27  0:58               ` Bart Van Assche
2021-08-27  2:48               ` Bart Van Assche
2021-08-27  3:13                 ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-27  4:49                   ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-27 14:34                     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-08-29 23:02                       ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-30  2:31                         ` Keith Busch
2021-08-30  3:03                           ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-30  2:40                         ` Bart Van Assche
2021-08-30  3:07                           ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-30 17:14                             ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-08-30 21:42                               ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-28  1:45                   ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-08-28  2:19                     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-08-28  2:42                       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-08-28 13:14                         ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-08-28  1:59   ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-08-28  2:41     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-08-27  2:30 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-28  2:14   ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cb651839-bc72-5b85-c531-af28b84dcbaf@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox