From: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Steffen Maier <maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/6] bsg: fix regression resulting in panics when sending commands via BSG and some sanity cleanups
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 16:11:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1502120928.git.bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Hello all,
Steffen noticed recently that we have a regression in the BSG code that
prevents us from sending any traffic over this interface. After I
researched this a bit, it turned out that this affects not only zFCP, but
likely all LLDs that implements the BSG API. This was introduced in 4.11
(details in Patch 1 of this series).
I imagine the regression happened because of some very "unfortunate"
variable- namings. I can not fix them, as they involve the base struct
request, but I tried to add some cleanups that should make the
relationships between stuff more visible in the future I hope.
Patch 1 - Regression Fix; Also tagged for stable
Patch 2-6 - Cleanups
I tagged this as RFC. Patches 2-6 are a 'nice to have' IMO, Patch 1 is
obviously necessary, and if it is OK, I can re-send it separately if
necessary. If you don't like the changes in the other patches, I don't mind
dropping them.
I am not sure about Patch 4. It certainly works, but it changes
user-visible behavior, in what I believe is within the behavior described
by the SG interface. It makes the different methods of how BSG passes
commands down to the LLDs more conform with each other - even though I
can't make them the exact same. More details in the patch description.
I rebased the series on Jens' for-next and I have function-tested the
series on s390x's zFCP with the tools provided in the zfcp HBA API library
(https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/linux390/zfcp-hbaapi.html) and
some custom code to test the read/write interface of BSG.
Reviews are more than welcome :)
Beste Grüße / Best regards,
- Benjamin Block
Benjamin Block (6):
bsg: fix kernel panic resulting from missing allocation of a
reply-buffer
bsg: assign sense_len instead of fixed SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE
bsg: scsi-transport: add compile-tests to prevent reply-buffer
overflows
bsg: refactor ioctl to use regular BSG-command infrastructure for
SG_IO
bsg: reduce unecessary arguments for bsg_map_hdr()
bsg: reduce unecessary arguments for blk_complete_sgv4_hdr_rq()
block/bsg-lib.c | 4 +-
block/bsg.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c | 3 ++
drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c | 3 ++
include/linux/bsg-lib.h | 2 +
5 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
--
2.12.2
next reply other threads:[~2017-08-09 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-09 14:11 Benjamin Block [this message]
2017-08-09 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] bsg: fix kernel panic resulting from missing allocation of a reply-buffer Benjamin Block
2017-08-10 9:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-10 22:10 ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-10 22:45 ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-11 8:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11 9:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11 13:49 ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-11 14:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11 15:32 ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-11 15:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11 16:01 ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-13 14:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-14 16:33 ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-14 16:32 ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-16 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-09 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] bsg: assign sense_len instead of fixed SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE Benjamin Block
2017-08-10 9:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-09 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] bsg: scsi-transport: add compile-tests to prevent reply-buffer overflows Benjamin Block
2017-08-10 9:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-09 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] bsg: refactor ioctl to use regular BSG-command infrastructure for SG_IO Benjamin Block
2017-08-10 8:24 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-08-10 9:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-10 22:12 ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-09 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] bsg: reduce unnecessary arguments for bsg_map_hdr() Benjamin Block
2017-08-10 8:26 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-08-10 9:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-10 22:19 ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-09 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] bsg: reduce unnecessary arguments for blk_complete_sgv4_hdr_rq() Benjamin Block
2017-08-10 8:27 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-08-10 9:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1502120928.git.bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=open-iscsi@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).