From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] loop: Fix teardown
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 12:51:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1789587960.git.bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)
Hi Jens,
My attempts to help Tetsuo with fixing the issues in his loop driver patch
series have not been successful so far. Hence this patch series. (See also
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/60bf7af2-b84e-4056-9195-a26ad51ada46@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp/).
When tearing down an autoclear loop device upon release, the loop driver
must drain in-flight I/O and flush workqueues to prevent NULL pointer
dereferences in lo_rw_aio() and related I/O paths.
However, the .release() block device callback is invoked while holding
disk->open_mutex. Freezing the request queue or draining workqueues under
disk->open_mutex causes lock inversion and circular locking dependencies
(e.g., when worker threads or I/O completion paths also acquire open_mutex
or interact with request queue synchronization).
This patch series resolves the lock inversion by:
1. Adding a .post_release() block device operation that is called
synchronously from bdev_release() immediately after disk->open_mutex
is released.
2. Migrating __loop_clr_fd() to .post_release(), allowing loop device
teardown and queue freezing to happen outside of disk->open_mutex.
Please consider applying this patch series.
Thanks,
Bart.
Bart Van Assche (2):
block: Add post_release() operation
loop: Perform __loop_clr_fd() after disk->open_mutex is dropped
block/bdev.c | 3 ++
drivers/block/loop.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
include/linux/blkdev.h | 5 ++++
rust/kernel/block/mq/gen_disk.rs | 1 +
4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 19:51 Bart Van Assche [this message]
2026-09-16 19:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: Add post_release() operation Bart Van Assche
2026-09-16 19:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] loop: Perform __loop_clr_fd() after disk->open_mutex is dropped Bart Van Assche
2026-09-16 22:47 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-09-16 23:05 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-09-17 0:16 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-09-19 2:48 ` [syzbot ci] Re: loop: Fix teardown syzbot ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1789587960.git.bvanassche@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox