Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] loop: Fix teardown
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 12:51:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1789587960.git.bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)

Hi Jens,

My attempts to help Tetsuo with fixing the issues in his loop driver patch
series have not been successful so far. Hence this patch series. (See also
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/60bf7af2-b84e-4056-9195-a26ad51ada46@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp/).

When tearing down an autoclear loop device upon release, the loop driver
must drain in-flight I/O and flush workqueues to prevent NULL pointer
dereferences in lo_rw_aio() and related I/O paths.

However, the .release() block device callback is invoked while holding
disk->open_mutex. Freezing the request queue or draining workqueues under
disk->open_mutex causes lock inversion and circular locking dependencies
(e.g., when worker threads or I/O completion paths also acquire open_mutex
or interact with request queue synchronization).

This patch series resolves the lock inversion by:
1. Adding a .post_release() block device operation that is called
   synchronously from bdev_release() immediately after disk->open_mutex
   is released.
2. Migrating __loop_clr_fd() to .post_release(), allowing loop device
   teardown and queue freezing to happen outside of disk->open_mutex.

Please consider applying this patch series.

Thanks,

Bart.

Bart Van Assche (2):
  block: Add post_release() operation
  loop: Perform __loop_clr_fd() after disk->open_mutex is dropped

 block/bdev.c                     |  3 ++
 drivers/block/loop.c             | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 include/linux/blkdev.h           |  5 ++++
 rust/kernel/block/mq/gen_disk.rs |  1 +
 4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)


             reply	other threads:[~2026-09-16 19:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-16 19:51 Bart Van Assche [this message]
2026-09-16 19:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: Add post_release() operation Bart Van Assche
2026-09-16 19:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] loop: Perform __loop_clr_fd() after disk->open_mutex is dropped Bart Van Assche
2026-09-16 22:47   ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-09-16 23:05     ` Bart Van Assche
2026-09-17  0:16       ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-09-19  2:48 ` [syzbot ci] Re: loop: Fix teardown syzbot ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1789587960.git.bvanassche@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox