From: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ming.lei@redhat.com, hare@suse.de, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 00/14] blk-mq: Reduce static requests memory footprint for shared sbitmap
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 19:23:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3a11ba59cc0a912fa6486a148a7458a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81d9e019-b730-221e-a8c0-f72a8422a2ec@huawei.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1164 bytes --]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Garry [mailto:john.garry@huawei.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 7:05 PM
> To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>; kashyap.desai@broadcom.com
> Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> ming.lei@redhat.com; hare@suse.de; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] blk-mq: Reduce static requests memory
> footprint for shared sbitmap
>
> On 05/10/2021 13:35, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> Baseline is 1b2d1439fc25 (block/for-next) Merge branch
> >> 'for-5.16/io_uring'
> >> into for-next
> > Let's get this queued up for testing, thanks John.
>
> Cheers, appreciated
>
> @Kashyap, You mentioned that when testing you saw a performance
> regression from v5.11 -> v5.12 - any idea on that yet? Can you describe
> the
> scenario, like IO scheduler and how many disks and the type? Does
> disabling
> host_tagset_enable restore performance?
John - I am still working on this. System was not available due to some
other debugging.
>
> From checking differences between those kernels, I don't see anything
> directly relevant in sbitmap support or in the megaraid sas driver.
>
> Thanks,
> John
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4212 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-05 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-05 10:23 [PATCH v5 00/14] blk-mq: Reduce static requests memory footprint for shared sbitmap John Garry
2021-10-05 10:23 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] blk-mq: Change rqs check in blk_mq_free_rqs() John Garry
2021-10-05 10:23 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] block: Rename BLKDEV_MAX_RQ -> BLKDEV_DEFAULT_RQ John Garry
2021-10-05 10:23 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] blk-mq: Relocate shared sbitmap resize in blk_mq_update_nr_requests() John Garry
2021-10-05 10:23 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] blk-mq: Invert check " John Garry
2021-10-05 10:23 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] blk-mq-sched: Rename blk_mq_sched_alloc_{tags -> map_and_rqs}() John Garry
2021-10-05 10:23 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] blk-mq-sched: Rename blk_mq_sched_free_{requests -> rqs}() John Garry
2021-10-05 10:23 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] blk-mq: Pass driver tags to blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping() John Garry
2021-10-05 10:23 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] blk-mq: Don't clear driver tags own mapping John Garry
2021-10-05 10:23 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] blk-mq: Add blk_mq_tag_update_sched_shared_sbitmap() John Garry
2021-10-05 10:23 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] blk-mq: Add blk_mq_alloc_map_and_rqs() John Garry
2021-10-05 10:23 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] blk-mq: Refactor and rename blk_mq_free_map_and_{requests->rqs}() John Garry
2021-10-05 10:23 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] blk-mq: Use shared tags for shared sbitmap support John Garry
2021-10-05 10:23 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] blk-mq: Stop using pointers for blk_mq_tags bitmap tags John Garry
2021-10-05 10:23 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] blk-mq: Change shared sbitmap naming to shared tags John Garry
2021-10-05 12:35 ` [PATCH v5 00/14] blk-mq: Reduce static requests memory footprint for shared sbitmap Jens Axboe
2021-10-05 13:34 ` John Garry
2021-10-05 13:53 ` Kashyap Desai [this message]
2021-10-05 16:23 ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-07 20:31 ` Kashyap Desai
2021-10-08 3:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-08 8:07 ` John Garry
2021-10-08 10:17 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d3a11ba59cc0a912fa6486a148a7458a@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).