From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8752EC88CB4 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 18:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232560AbjFLSLE (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:11:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36244 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230488AbjFLSLD (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:11:03 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-f45.google.com (mail-pj1-f45.google.com [209.85.216.45]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67DFFE64; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 11:11:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-25bc612be7cso1199721a91.1; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 11:11:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686593462; x=1689185462; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=m7cSHR9Osde9hZfK+eZtXBg2Q6SmGt3LF/vqlGngynk=; b=MqYMcsIYqnz7T3Gvf9NHhquX1mAbVV42zbuk7fXDT/dc+keCea+gtq+pWoSkIwAD88 IPcU/cmT5RoujX+LD0gFNVQ+/FZGtLBfi2HZwdVn2PUTAbyrfJBcAs0SlgCkZiYIZydb WXrRjcKgRn+Gz/phdRVO6CLtA1XK5C9Rv4KOlcrU0amsg91LxUrf6diVIOs/Br7dqfSf AgT9jAEU0J2A9YUTbcDRLXf7lBch2kqnKPgPxhQiOJSYPhyryd5hIxcWohsJPqrxJWID chR5XpQciAgJZg9pec2I0sSRbsW4TyMcU9/jVR8czqSH4RLmI5sGkgEuoUsXSpT0xlYT ZpYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxOBhlsoe8T6RtbFBRWjp5cdUNxP3EzM46HtOqioA6xYaw4WTMP C/KxzRE73xqQUgG70MSCY3U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ59d2Vto8tuoYIpbCTZzBgawTaGn/EI2BLkdWSkiL/BHNbWbJyE6J5Jxk6opFBuTiXjt20PeQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:4293:b0:259:30e7:7349 with SMTP id p19-20020a17090a429300b0025930e77349mr8576594pjg.8.1686593461737; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 11:11:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.3.219] ([98.51.102.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b19-20020a17090a551300b0025023726fc4sm9474385pji.26.2023.06.12.11.11.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Jun 2023 11:11:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 11:11:00 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] scsi: improve warning message in scsi_device_block() Content-Language: en-US To: mwilck@suse.com, "Martin K. Petersen" , Christoph Hellwig , Ming Lei Cc: James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke References: <20230612165049.29440-1-mwilck@suse.com> <20230612165049.29440-8-mwilck@suse.com> From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <20230612165049.29440-8-mwilck@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On 6/12/23 09:50, mwilck@suse.com wrote: > - WARN_ONCE(err, "__scsi_internal_device_block_nowait(%s) failed: err = %d\n", > - dev_name(&sdev->sdev_gendev), err); > + WARN_ONCE(err, "%s: failed to block %s in state %d\n", > + __func__, dev_name(&sdev->sdev_gendev), state); > } > > /** Shouldn't this patch be merged into patch 3/7? Thanks, Bart.