public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: "Harris, James R" <james.r.harris@intel.com>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ming.lei@redhat.com" <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: kernel oops when rmmod'ing ublk_drv w/ missing UBLK_CMD_START_DEV
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 13:05:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d949dbc2-a0cf-c581-c5ca-ddefc592a0a5@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <78E62777-98A7-4D19-9608-D8A3412D9800@intel.com>

On 1/25/23 12:50?PM, Harris, James R wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I can reliably hit a kernel oops with ublk_drv using the following abnormal sequence of events (repro .c file at end of this e-mail):
> 
> 1) modprobe ublk_drv
> 2) run test app which basically does:
>   a) submit UBLK_CMD_ADD_DEV
>   b) submit UBLK_CMD_SET_PARAMS
>   c) wait for completions
>   d) do *not* submit UBLK_CMD_START_DEV
>   e) exit
> 3) rmmod ublk_drv
> 
> Reproduces on 6.2-rc5, 6.1.5 and 6.1.

Something like this may do it, but I'll let Ming sort out the details
on what's the most appropriate fix.


diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 17b677b5d3b2..dacc13e2a476 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -1149,11 +1149,17 @@ static void ublk_unquiesce_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
 	blk_mq_kick_requeue_list(ub->ub_disk->queue);
 }
 
-static void ublk_stop_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
+/*
+ * Returns if the device was live or not
+ */
+static bool ublk_stop_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
 {
+	bool was_live = false;
+
 	mutex_lock(&ub->mutex);
 	if (ub->dev_info.state == UBLK_S_DEV_DEAD)
 		goto unlock;
+	was_live = true;
 	if (ublk_can_use_recovery(ub)) {
 		if (ub->dev_info.state == UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE)
 			__ublk_quiesce_dev(ub);
@@ -1168,6 +1174,7 @@ static void ublk_stop_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
 	ublk_cancel_dev(ub);
 	mutex_unlock(&ub->mutex);
 	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ub->monitor_work);
+	return was_live;
 }
 
 /* device can only be started after all IOs are ready */
@@ -1470,7 +1477,8 @@ static int ublk_add_tag_set(struct ublk_device *ub)
 
 static void ublk_remove(struct ublk_device *ub)
 {
-	ublk_stop_dev(ub);
+	if (!ublk_stop_dev(ub))
+		return;
 	cancel_work_sync(&ub->stop_work);
 	cancel_work_sync(&ub->quiesce_work);
 	cdev_device_del(&ub->cdev, &ub->cdev_dev);
@@ -1771,7 +1779,8 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_stop_dev(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
 	if (!ub)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	ublk_stop_dev(ub);
+	if (!ublk_stop_dev(ub))
+		return -EINVAL;
 	cancel_work_sync(&ub->stop_work);
 	cancel_work_sync(&ub->quiesce_work);
 

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-25 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-25 19:50 kernel oops when rmmod'ing ublk_drv w/ missing UBLK_CMD_START_DEV Harris, James R
2023-01-25 20:05 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-01-25 20:43   ` Harris, James R
2023-01-26 11:33   ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d949dbc2-a0cf-c581-c5ca-ddefc592a0a5@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=james.r.harris@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox