From: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>, <axboe@kernel.dk>,
<miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>, <richard@nod.at>, <vigneshr@ti.com>,
<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
<yi.zhang@huawei.com>, <yebin10@huawei.com>, <houtao1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [QUESTION] blk_mq_freeze_queue in elevator_init_mq
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 17:00:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9ca8e57-55b8-96f8-e5fd-6103c8b1fa4b@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YZS4FYxtxYAXjtFJ@T590>
On 2021/11/17 16:06, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 11:37:13AM +0800, yangerkun wrote:
>> Nowdays we meet the boot regression while enable lots of mtdblock
>
> What is your boot regression? Any dmesg log?
The result is that when boot with 5.10 kernel compare with 4.4, 5.10
will consume about 1.6s more...
>
>> compare with 4.4. The main reason was that the blk_mq_freeze_queue in
>> elevator_init_mq will wait a RCU gap which want to make sure no IO will
>> happen while blk_mq_init_sched.
>
> There isn't RCU grace period implied in the blk_mq_freeze_queue() called
> from elevator_init_mq(), because the .q_usage_counter works at atomic mode
> at that time.
>
>>
>> Other module like loop meets this problem too and has been fix with
>
> Again, what is the problem?
commit 2112f5c1330a671fa852051d85cb9eadc05d7eb7
Author: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Date: Thu Aug 5 10:42:00 2021 -0700
loop: Select I/O scheduler 'none' from inside add_disk()
...
e.g. via a udev rule. This approach has an advantage compared to
changing
the I/O scheduler from userspace from 'mq-deadline' into 'none', namely
that synchronize_rcu() does not get called.
Actually, we has meets this problem too
before(https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-block/msg70660.html).
>
>> follow patches:
>>
>> 2112f5c1330a loop: Select I/O scheduler 'none' from inside add_disk()
>> 90b7198001f2 blk-mq: Introduce the BLK_MQ_F_NO_SCHED_BY_DEFAULT flag
>>
>> They change the default IO scheduler for loop to 'none'. So no need to
>> call blk_mq_freeze_queue and blk_mq_init_sched. But it seems not
>> appropriate for mtdblocks. Mtdblocks can use 'mq-deadline' to help
>> optimize the random write with the help of mtdblock's cache. Once change
>> to 'none', we may meet the regression for random write.
>>
>> commit 737eb78e82d52d35df166d29af32bf61992de71d
>> Author: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
>> Date: Thu Sep 5 18:51:33 2019 +0900
>>
>> block: Delay default elevator initialization
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Additionally, to make sure that the elevator initialization is never
>> done while requests are in-flight (there should be none when the device
>> driver calls device_add_disk()), freeze and quiesce the device request
>> queue before calling blk_mq_init_sched() in elevator_init_mq().
>> ...
>>
>> This commit add blk_mq_freeze_queue in elevator_init_mq which try to
>> make sure no in-flight request while we go through blk_mq_init_sched.
>> But does there any drivers can leave IO alive while we go through
>> elevator_init_mq? And if no, maybe we can just remove this logical to
>> fix the regression...
>
> SCSI should have passthrough requests at that moment.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ming
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-17 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-17 3:37 [QUESTION] blk_mq_freeze_queue in elevator_init_mq yangerkun
2021-11-17 4:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-17 8:39 ` yangerkun
2021-11-17 8:06 ` Ming Lei
2021-11-17 8:37 ` yangerkun
2021-11-17 9:00 ` yangerkun [this message]
2021-11-17 10:19 ` Ming Lei
2021-11-18 13:12 ` yangerkun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d9ca8e57-55b8-96f8-e5fd-6103c8b1fa4b@huawei.com \
--to=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=yebin10@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox