Re: [PATCH] badblocks: Fix a nonsense WARN_ON() which checks whether a u64 variable < 0

Coly Li
2025-03-10T14:28:25Z

> 2025年3月10日 21:49，Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> 写道：
>
> On 3/10/25 7:44 AM, Coly Li wrote:
>>
>>
>>> 2025?3?10? 21:42?Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> ???
>>>
>>> On 3/9/25 10:12 AM, Coly Li wrote:
>>>> Hi Jens,
>>>>
>>>> Could you please take a look at it and pick this patch into the for-6.15/block branch? The patch is generated based on the for-6.15/block branch.
>>>
>>> Just a heads-up - you don't need to send these emails outside of
>>> just sending the patch, I do get the patches. If I didn't, then that'd
>>> be a problem. If you feel patches need extra context, then just do a
>>> cover letter for them.
>>
>> So if you are the receiver of the patch email, then I don?t need to
>> worry that you will treat it as a normal patch for review. Can I take
>> this as a rule?
>
> Yes of course - I don't think I've ever seen anyone else send out a
> patch with a followup a few minutes later to apply it. Just send out the
> patch, and it should get applied. If it doesn't after a week or
> whatever, then feel free to send a reminder. But a reminder to apply it
> a few min after the original patch is a bit unusual and odd.

Copied. So normally I will not send a following email to explain the extra information. If it is necessary, I will compose a cover letter.

Thanks for the notice.

Coly Li