From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: don't call blk_mq_run_hw_queues() for dead or dying queues
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 18:59:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e16814f3-1fc0-ef46-760e-cc23d951030f@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6096aa5-0311-6d7f-697a-bb5771ca5fc7@broadcom.com>
On 3/26/19 6:49 PM, James Smart wrote:
>
> Cancelling/flushing scan_work before starting reset won't work. Hannes
> is, correct, reset must take precedent.
>
> The scenario is a controller that was recently connected, thus scan work
> started, and while the scan thread is running, there's an error or
> connectivity is lost. The errors force the reset - which must run to
> terminate any outstanding requests, including those issued by the scan
> thread. This has to happen or we're going to hang the scan thread as
> it's synchronous io. The
> nvme_fc_delete_association->nvme_start_queues() sequence says the reset
> path froze the queues, cancelled all outstanding io and is unfreezing
> the queues to allow io to pass again, so that any new io on the request
> queue can be rejected while the controller is not connected (ioctls or
> subsequent io from the scan thread while the controller is unconnected
> as well as anything that was pending on the io queues from the fs that
> should be bounced back for multipath). Meanwhile, the scan thread got
> the error on the io request, and since it's the identify command that
> failed, it's deleting the namespace at the same time the transport is
> unfreezing the queues.
>
> Given the transport nvme_start_queues() routine has no idea what
> ns-queues exist, or what state the ns queues are in, it seems like a
> synchronization issue on the ns queue itself, that can't be solved by
> scheduling transport work elements.
>
> I wonder if it should be something like this:
> --- a 2019-03-26 10:46:08.576056741 -0700
> +++ b 2019-03-26 10:47:55.081252967 -0700
> @@ -3870,8 +3870,10 @@ void nvme_start_queues(struct nvme_ctrl
> struct nvme_ns *ns;
>
> down_read(&ctrl->namespaces_rwsem);
> - list_for_each_entry(ns, &ctrl->namespaces, list)
> - blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(ns->queue);
> + list_for_each_entry(ns, &ctrl->namespaces, list) {
> + if (!test_bit(NVME_NS_REMOVING, &ns->flags))
> + blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(ns->queue);
> + }
> up_read(&ctrl->namespaces_rwsem);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_start_queues);
>
> which if valid, would also mean the same check should be in
> nvme_stop_queues() and perhaps elsewhere.
>
Well, if the namespace wouldn't be part of the list in the first place
once it's been set to 'REMOVING'... lemme check.
Cheers,
Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-26 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-26 12:07 [PATCH] block: don't call blk_mq_run_hw_queues() for dead or dying queues Hannes Reinecke
2019-03-26 13:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-26 14:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-03-26 15:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-26 15:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-03-26 17:49 ` James Smart
2019-03-26 17:59 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2019-03-27 0:05 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-27 1:25 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e16814f3-1fc0-ef46-760e-cc23d951030f@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox