From: Liqueur Librazy <im@librazy.org>
To: zhangyoufu@gmail.com
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] blk-throttle panic on 32bit machine after startup
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 23:22:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e726813b-4f6d-3a5d-6adb-8407a9b4c7f7@librazy.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEKhA2x1Qi3Ywaj9fzdsaChabqDSMe2m2441wReg_V=39_Cuhg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
Yet another colleague of the reporter here. I found that some
precondition maybe not sound when tg->slice_end[rw] is initialized with
0, which time_before(INITIAL_JIFFIES, 0) holds true in 32-bit Linux.
As in v5.15-rc6/block/blk-throttle.c
1. L833
/* Determine if previously allocated or extended slice is complete or
not */
static bool throtl_slice_used(struct throtl_grp *tg, bool rw)
{
if (time_in_range(jiffies, tg->slice_start[rw], tg->slice_end[rw]))
return false;
return true;
}
throtl_slice_used will always return true for a newly initialized slice.
This may be intentional behavior but not mentioned in comment.
(except when jiffies == 0, which is another topic: will
time_in_range_open do better here?)
2. L791, in throtl_start_new_slice_with_credit
/*
* Previous slice has expired. We must have trimmed it after last
* bio dispatch. That means since start of last slice, we never used
* that bandwidth. Do try to make use of that bandwidth while giving
* credit.
*/
if (time_after_eq(start, tg->slice_start[rw]))
tg->slice_start[rw] = start;
As mentioned in my colleague Haoran Luo's reply, time_after_eq(start,
tg->slice_start[rw]) is falsy when the jiffies had not wrapped around.
A easy solution is to add a check for tg->slice_start[rw] == 0, or we
should initialize tg->slice_start[rw] and tg->slice_end[rw] with
INITIAL_JIFFIES.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-18 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-18 7:08 [BUG] blk-throttle panic on 32bit machine after startup Youfu Zhang
2021-10-18 15:22 ` Liqueur Librazy [this message]
2021-10-19 17:45 ` Tejun Heo
2021-10-21 4:26 ` Youfu Zhang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-10-18 8:00 Haoran Luo
2021-10-18 9:25 Haoran Luo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e726813b-4f6d-3a5d-6adb-8407a9b4c7f7@librazy.org \
--to=im@librazy.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangyoufu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox