From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D718C432C3 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EF420718 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="Iukl2JLy" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726674AbfKNOI7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:08:59 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-f47.google.com ([209.85.166.47]:42723 "EHLO mail-io1-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726605AbfKNOI7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:08:59 -0500 Received: by mail-io1-f47.google.com with SMTP id k13so6891192ioa.9 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 06:08:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IZwgKmH1FAobFu9aPkm4pTqaHcl3j2dKrzm5t8hdzjU=; b=Iukl2JLyDAGQkDzizJVV2gUe2YbuO3Z1oIbf49qui0lo5aL4YQhQPouOICeJ9J3qGN LZIYYHpFxRug60xT64uDxL9yMfi5v1r3z4LYSM2qGjNyEj240dq5YA51lyB0asKYTov3 0DIKCYhDpaKWiUXrWkHOr1dUJ68IceGTAXMlZXi9FRexq3slQNJOshFhcPAF3JlxPRQW 2R2/OFGBY+pOJarlI20JQtsvmHy7QntH9U4E8/MnJ0g3UV9/4J5OyZ+PwGWWJX7PXsx2 6T0F+yOFDmBV/Yv0KAp2yLjUom+dK8matPex6XovhUPsXJAjKn3Y03DzDNwhtFK1DijQ sWvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IZwgKmH1FAobFu9aPkm4pTqaHcl3j2dKrzm5t8hdzjU=; b=dok95Vvh8+E3Jh+0PLkUdkeqc2fAuJbe6CO6cY6bwvxJ6M0rRztY3NktVL8iG92hyz ehf1UXUpubNLxI9fYKh2JIEqJ1U0XGepn+G8Y/mTWyGqdBfKmOh/VArmEwRfbQrOXrn3 i8DVI/nj9myf3q5X/YeBd5TGgNzFhNW6JlSh0mcXWqy1Z1P0hG56+i8x7jW6C/soqg8Y NmGmLJeD0ehz9BoW9wbc/eIzyKvtpHJj9bKzr5OrQbtLnPYW2IYQVgKRkf8in356EtFB XumOeKKDAXGfr90xqTGMDw7LGgq7iP5Pd1A4lcH1Sxccw71X+184kGMg9iCrCIv/IUF2 tDxA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWuDYMug9nfT5jTIYP/vKPhL1UxcJNdYcd+F0mCimO3nJPqDTNG KA+vnQxkMbcnZ/aDCksQepJs9bTGXTI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzq6/rW5qb0q4xiD0FoGvfebxZDSkHTSEkxFe2ku3aIsU4BhGp4FmozblzIlkV9S21Tmem+Ww== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:80d5:: with SMTP id h21mr8292113ior.298.1573740536951; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 06:08:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.159] ([65.144.74.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t18sm573258ioc.41.2019.11.14.06.08.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 06:08:56 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: disk revalidation cleanups and fixlets To: Christoph Hellwig , Jan Kara Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org References: <20191106151439.30056-1-hch@lst.de> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:08:55 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191106151439.30056-1-hch@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On 11/6/19 8:14 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi Jens and Jan, > > this series takes the disk size change detection and revalidations > from Jan a step further and fully integrate the code path for > partitioned vs non-partitioned devices. It also fixes up a few > bits where we have unintentionally differing behavior. > Were you going to re-send this on top of the other stuff for 5.5? If so, should probably get queued up... -- Jens Axboe