public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>
Cc: hch@lst.de, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 0/2] block, nvme: removing virtual boundary mask reliance
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 18:12:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f12584c7-4f91-4d22-828e-cc64ee935110@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aQ1Fa7hPssIFOBLg@kbusch-mbp>

On 11/6/25 6:03 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 08:04:54AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
>> From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
>>
>> The purpose is to allow optimization decisions to happen per IO, and
>> flexibility to utilize unaligned buffers for hardware that supports it.
> 
> Hi Jens,
> 
> Did you have a chance to consider this one? Thanks,

Looks like I missed this as it was during my last race^Wpto, now
queued up!

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-07  1:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-14 15:04 [PATCHv5 0/2] block, nvme: removing virtual boundary mask reliance Keith Busch
2025-10-14 15:04 ` [PATCHv5 1/2] block: accumulate memory segment gaps per bio Keith Busch
2025-10-14 21:18   ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-10-15  4:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-11  4:26   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-11-11  4:50     ` Keith Busch
2025-11-11  7:14       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-11  9:36         ` Yu Kuai
2025-11-11  9:39           ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-11 10:14             ` Yu Kuai
2025-11-11 13:25               ` Keith Busch
2025-11-11 13:40                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-11 13:54                   ` Keith Busch
2025-11-11 13:58                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-11 14:03                     ` Yu Kuai
2025-10-14 15:04 ` [PATCHv5 2/2] nvme: remove virtual boundary for sgl capable devices Keith Busch
2025-10-14 21:19   ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-11-07  1:03 ` [PATCHv5 0/2] block, nvme: removing virtual boundary mask reliance Keith Busch
2025-11-07  1:12   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2025-11-07  1:12 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f12584c7-4f91-4d22-828e-cc64ee935110@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kbusch@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox