From: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>
To: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: cui.tao@linux.dev, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
baijiaju1990@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-iolatency: flush enable work after policy deactivation
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 13:03:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f18106a3-e478-4766-8729-0ffb82a48b88@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260621135916.2657247-1-zzzccc427@gmail.com>
在 2026/6/21 21:59, Cen Zhang 写道:
> A blk-iolatency rq-qos teardown can free struct blk_iolatency while a
> freshly queued enable_work callback still references it. The observed
> failure is:
>
> blkcg_iolatency_exit() flushes enable_work before deactivating the
> iolatency policy. However, blkcg_deactivate_policy() calls
> iolatency_pd_offline() for online policy data, and iolatency_pd_offline()
> clears min_lat_nsec through iolatency_set_min_lat_nsec(). If this clears
> the last nonzero latency target, enable_cnt reaches zero and schedules
> enable_work again after the flush has already returned.
>
> The buggy scenario involves two paths, with each column showing the order
> within that path:
>
> blkcg_iolatency_exit() path: system_wq worker path:
> 1. Flush old enable_work. 1. enable_work is idle.
> 2. Deactivate the policy. 2. no worker owns it.
> 3. Offline queues new enable_work. 3. work item becomes pending.
> 4. Free blkiolat. 4. worker later runs the item.
> 5. Owner storage is gone. 5. worker dereferences blkiolat.
>
> Flush enable_work again after blkcg_deactivate_policy() returns and before
> freeing blkiolat. Policy offline callbacks have completed at that point,
> so the second drain covers the late queueing path without changing the
> normal enable/disable accounting rules.
>
Acked-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
The first flush_work() above blkcg_deactivate_policy() is now redundant
and can be dropped.
> Validation reproduced this kernel report:
> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in assign_work+0x2a/0x150
>
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> dump_stack_lvl+0x53/0x70
> print_report+0xd0/0x630
> ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x10
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? __virt_addr_valid+0xea/0x1a0
> ? assign_work+0x2a/0x150
> kasan_report+0xce/0x100
> ? assign_work+0x2a/0x150
> assign_work+0x2a/0x150
> worker_thread+0x1b7/0x500
> ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> kthread+0x192/0x1d0
> ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> ret_from_fork+0x2ac/0x3c0
> ? __pfx_ret_from_fork+0x10/0x10
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? __switch_to+0x2d5/0x6e0
> ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
> </TASK>
>
> Allocated by task 470:
> kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60
> kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30
> __kasan_kmalloc+0x8f/0xa0
> iolatency_set_limit+0x301/0x450
> cgroup_file_write+0x178/0x2e0
> kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1ef/0x290
> vfs_write+0x446/0x6f0
> ksys_write+0xc7/0x160
> do_syscall_64+0xf9/0x540
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> Freed by task 611:
> kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60
> kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30
> kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60
> __kasan_slab_free+0x43/0x70
> kfree+0x131/0x390
> rq_qos_exit+0x5d/0x90
> __del_gendisk+0x394/0x490
> del_gendisk+0xa1/0xe0
> virtblk_remove+0x41/0xd0
> virtio_dev_remove+0x63/0xe0
> device_release_driver_internal+0x246/0x2e0
> unbind_store+0xa9/0xb0
> kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1ef/0x290
> vfs_write+0x446/0x6f0
> ksys_write+0xc7/0x160
> do_syscall_64+0xf9/0x540
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> Last potentially related work creation:
> kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60
> kasan_record_aux_stack+0x8c/0xa0
> __queue_work+0x42a/0x800
> queue_work_on+0x5d/0x70
> iolatency_set_min_lat_nsec+0x196/0x230
> iolatency_pd_offline+0x1f/0x40
> blkcg_deactivate_policy+0x194/0x270
> blkcg_iolatency_exit+0x33/0x40
> rq_qos_exit+0x5d/0x90
> __del_gendisk+0x394/0x490
> del_gendisk+0xa1/0xe0
> virtblk_remove+0x41/0xd0
> virtio_dev_remove+0x63/0xe0
> device_release_driver_internal+0x246/0x2e0
> unbind_store+0xa9/0xb0
> kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1ef/0x290
> vfs_write+0x446/0x6f0
> ksys_write+0xc7/0x160
> do_syscall_64+0xf9/0x540
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> Second to last potentially related work creation:
> kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60
> kasan_record_aux_stack+0x8c/0xa0
> __queue_work+0x42a/0x800
> queue_work_on+0x5d/0x70
> iolatency_set_min_lat_nsec+0x196/0x230
> iolatency_set_limit+0x3f1/0x450
> cgroup_file_write+0x178/0x2e0
> kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1ef/0x290
> vfs_write+0x446/0x6f0
> ksys_write+0xc7/0x160
> do_syscall_64+0xf9/0x540
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> Fixes: 8a177a36da6c ("blk-iolatency: Fix inflight count imbalances and IO hangs on offline")
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.5
> Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>
> ---
> block/blk-iolatency.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-iolatency.c b/block/blk-iolatency.c
> index 1aaee6fb0f59..a0bdd8a5c94c 100644
> --- a/block/blk-iolatency.c
> +++ b/block/blk-iolatency.c
> @@ -639,6 +639,11 @@ static void blkcg_iolatency_exit(struct rq_qos *rqos)
> timer_shutdown_sync(&blkiolat->timer);
> flush_work(&blkiolat->enable_work);
> blkcg_deactivate_policy(rqos->disk, &blkcg_policy_iolatency);
> + /*
> + * blkcg_deactivate_policy() invokes iolatency_pd_offline(), which may
> + * queue enable_work again when it clears the last latency target.
> + */
> + flush_work(&blkiolat->enable_work);
> kfree(blkiolat);
> }
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 5:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-21 13:59 [PATCH] blk-iolatency: flush enable work after policy deactivation Cen Zhang
2026-07-07 2:28 ` Cen Zhang
2026-07-08 5:03 ` Tao Cui [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f18106a3-e478-4766-8729-0ffb82a48b88@linux.dev \
--to=cui.tao@linux.dev \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=zzzccc427@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox