From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>, Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests] Make the NVMe tests more reliable
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 08:11:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe2fbdc2-8585-74fd-a222-b946fdab8909@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f8a82f6-5a7b-89ff-4a3a-fa4e9853fc35@suse.de>
On 8/6/19 1:11 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On 06/08/2019 01:25, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> [...]
>
>> + for ((i=0;i<10;i++)); do
>> + [ -e /sys/block/$dev/uuid ] &&
>> + [ -e /sys/block/$dev/wwid ] &&
>> + return 0
>> + sleep .1
>> + done
>> + return 1
>> fi
>> done
>> + return 1
>
> Hmmm, I don't really understand why you're adding the return {0,1} here.
> None of the callers of _find_nvme_loop_dev() does anything with the
> return value of the function.
>
> They expect either a nvme-device or an empty string and fail if the
> string is empty due to a non-empty diff in the golden output.
Hi Johannes,
The "return 0" statement has been added to break out of the two
for-loops. The first "return 1" statement has been added to make sure
that the echo "$dev" statement is executed at most once. The final
"return 1" statement has been added to make the return value consistent.
Do you perhaps want me to leave out {0,1} from the return statements?
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-06 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-05 23:25 [PATCH blktests] Make the NVMe tests more reliable Bart Van Assche
2019-08-06 8:11 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-08-06 15:11 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2019-08-07 7:14 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-08-06 15:43 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-07 17:23 ` Omar Sandoval
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe2fbdc2-8585-74fd-a222-b946fdab8909@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox