From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] bfq probe failed on 4.19-rc3
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:51:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x495zzcj7u8.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd71494f-4595-7586-4c46-000f2b2029aa@kernel.dk> (Jens Axboe's message of "Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:49:05 -0600")
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> writes:
> On 9/11/18 10:48 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> writes:
>>
>>> On 9/11/18 10:03 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that bfq doesn't appear in the I/O scheduler list on
>>>> 4.19-rc3. It seems that blkcg_policy_register() at the beginning of
>>>> bfq_init() returns -ENOSPC, hence the probe aborts silently.
>>>>
>>>> Is this already addressed?
>>>
>>> Haven't heard about this one before. What kernel did you last use that
>>> worked?
>>
>> I'm guessing you just need to update the maximum number of policies:
>>
>> /*
>> * Maximum number of blkcg policies allowed to be registered concurrently.
>> * Defined here to simplify include dependency.
>> */
>> #define BLKCG_MAX_POLS 3
>
> That is my guess too, hence the suggestion to try and disable the
> iolatency policy. Just tried here without, and it works, rebooting
> with to verify that we're running out of policy slots.
Functions calling this function: blkcg_policy_register
File Function Line
0 block/bfq-iosched.c bfq_init 5675 ret =
blkcg_policy_register(&blkcg_pol
icy_bfq);
1 block/blk-iolatency.c iolatency_init 946 return
blkcg_policy_register(&blkcg_pol
icy_iolatency);
2 block/blk-throttle.c throtl_init 2511 return
blkcg_policy_register(&blkcg_pol
icy_throtl);
3 block/cfq-iosched.c cfq_init 4869 ret =
blkcg_policy_register(&blkcg_pol
icy_cfq);
And then there were 4...
-Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-11 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-11 16:03 [REGRESSION] bfq probe failed on 4.19-rc3 Takashi Iwai
2018-09-11 16:09 ` Jens Axboe
2018-09-11 16:11 ` Takashi Iwai
2018-09-11 16:16 ` Takashi Iwai
2018-09-11 16:20 ` Jens Axboe
2018-09-11 16:48 ` Jeff Moyer
2018-09-11 16:49 ` Jens Axboe
2018-09-11 16:51 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2018-09-11 16:54 ` Jens Axboe
2018-09-11 16:57 ` Jeff Moyer
2018-09-11 16:59 ` Jens Axboe
2018-09-12 8:58 ` Takashi Iwai
2018-09-12 14:31 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x495zzcj7u8.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox