From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Christoph Hellwig , axboe@kernel.dk, martin.petersen@oracle.com, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com, shli@kernel.org, philipp.reisner@linbit.com, lars.ellenberg@linbit.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/27] scsi: sd: Separate zeroout and discard command choices From: "Martin K. Petersen" References: <20170405172125.22600-1-hch@lst.de> <20170405172125.22600-27-hch@lst.de> <58c3d6a6-924e-cc86-1907-a9fd02a39c0e@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 21:34:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <58c3d6a6-924e-cc86-1907-a9fd02a39c0e@redhat.com> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:56:31 +0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-ID: Paolo, > Should this be conditional on lbprz, lbpws, lbpws10 and max_ws_blocks? It is intentional that things can be overridden from userland for devices that report the "wrong" thing. We do the same for discard so people can set up udev rules. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering