From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: To: "hch\@lst.de" Cc: Bart Van Assche , "agk\@redhat.com" , "lars.ellenberg\@linbit.com" , "snitzer\@redhat.com" , "martin.petersen\@oracle.com" , "philipp.reisner\@linbit.com" , "axboe\@kernel.dk" , "shli\@kernel.org" , "linux-scsi\@vger.kernel.org" , "dm-devel\@redhat.com" , "drbd-dev\@lists.linbit.com" , "linux-block\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-raid\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/23] block: remove the discard_zeroes_data flag From: "Martin K. Petersen" References: <20170323143341.31549-1-hch@lst.de> <20170323143341.31549-24-hch@lst.de> <1490720411.2573.11.camel@sandisk.com> <20170330090655.GF12015@lst.de> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:29:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170330090655.GF12015@lst.de> (hch@lst.de's message of "Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:06:55 +0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-ID: "hch@lst.de" writes: > Jens, any opinion? I'd like to remove it too, but I fear it might > break things. We could deprecate it first with a warning when read > and then remove it a few releases down the road. I know of several apps that check this variable (as opposed to the ioctl). -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering